Hi Lady. Just a suggestion but for the duration of the discussion, would it be possible to restore the original comment thread with a comment at the end to direct existing and new contributions to the thread.
I'm not saying that you're crazy, I simply must have missed that part as I began editing before you changed the page to the correct actor and 5x05 appearance. However, why did you remove the new character history that I had added?
Hey, I've deleted the comment thread in the Medallion page since a consensus has been reached and the article has been renamed. I could've answered there, but it was going to be deleted ASAP, so I leave you a link here, check out this FAQs section for more information about how to reach a consensus. If you have any further doubts do let me know! :)
When you upload images, please put them in all applicable galleries. For example, an image from "New York City Serenade" with Aurora and Phillip in it would belong in the episode gallery, as well as both character galleries.
Thank you so much for uploading such great images! :)
Okay. Unfortunately, I'm going to need proof. Could you please make a screen-cap of your iTunes player, playing an episode, and add it to an image hosting site, like postimage or photobucket? Thank you.
I just noticed what you did on two templates. Applegirl already reverted your edits on Spell of Shattered Sight, about the color. She told you we put the color of the spell, not its appearance. Apparently, you did not appreciate.
So, i'll ask you: who told you you have the right to change the parameter of an infobox, just like that? I mean, seriously, these infoboxes have a specific construction, you just can't change it because you don't appreciate it personally. Especially when it'll change a lot of details on a lot of pages.
So please, next time, ask before edit a template. They are opened cos admins accept to let them like that. If the staff begins to see everyone edits a template like he wants it, just like you did, all templates will be closed.
I changed it so that the description of the curse/spell wouldn't be so general. Saying that the colour of the Spell of Shattered Sight is simply clear for instance could mean a variety of things. Saying that it's appearance only consists of mirror shards is more descriptive and precise. Another example, saying that they Dark Curse is black/grey could also mean that only a small component of it is black/grey instead of the entire cloud. Changing the box from "colour" to "appearance" allows for a more descriptive explanation of the item in question. It was only a small constructive change for the better and it did not change the entire layout of the template (I even kept the code for that section the same as "color"). But I will ask in the future then.