Hi Esk 😃 You haven't been active for nine weeks; does that mean that you are no longer interested in contributing to the wiki? Please note that if you wish to keep your position as a Discussion Moderator, you must resume active editing.
Hello! This may have been asked before, and I’m sorry if it has been and I’m asking it again. But there’s something I kind of don’t understand. What exactly is the difference between Nimue and The Darkness?
Is Nimues corrupt soul the darkness?
Was the darkness an entity that was created when Nimue used hg magic for evil?
If Nimues corrupt soul is the darkness, how can she exist within Emma and be in the underworld at the same time? (Since she exists in all dark ones and also said she would be in Emma’s mind, then later on was resurrected from the Underworld)?
On a page on the wiki it says that Nimue turned her soul into a curse that allowed it to live on beyond her death, and says the episode it was mentioned in was Quiet Minds, which that part was never mentioned in Quiet Minds? Wasn’t it Merlin tethering her soul to the dagger that, I guess you could say, created the Dark One Curse which allowed the darkness to be passed on to another if stabbed by the dagger?
Hey! In order to get rid of trolls more quickly in the future, we're giving all staff members rollback rights. This means that you can undo (rollback) all edits by one user in a single click, which removes their edit(s) from the Recent Activity feed. Use it well, and let me know if you have any questions!
It would be wonderful if you could join us! If you don't want people to know your true identity, you can easily create an account with a nickname or alias. You don't have to share anything you're not comfortable with :-)
Hi Esk, so I’m sort of learning how to do this whole discussion mod thing and I was wondering if you have any advice on how to deal with off topic stuff and warnings because as you can see from that killing of black knights thread, I’m still a bit unsure.
I have a question involving Anastasia from OUATIW. In my S2 of OUATIW, I was thinking of for the flashback in my S2 finale, I would explain Will and Anastasia's backstory that would featured characters from the first iteration of Cinderella. Anastasia would take the place of the stepsister known as Tisbe who made a minor appearence in S6 episode "The Other Shoe" due to runtime. I know that a crewmember tweeted that she met a duke, but they didn't said she married the duke. Anyway, my question related to a tweeted on October, 2016 made by Adam Horowitz that stated the Red Queen isn't the first iteration of Cinderella's stepsister. However, in an online podcast in November 2017, Eddy Kitsis stated that the Red Queen "would have been more tied" to the first Cinderella indicating that there is a connection between the two characters. So, my question is that does my idea of using the first iteration of Cinderella as the basics for Will and Anastasia's love story contradict the rules of the fanon season 8 and beyond board as its said to accept the show's canon from beginning to end.
Canonicaly, Lady Tremaine of the original Enchanted Forest had two daughters, Tisbe and Clorinda. So, it wouldn't be true to make them sisters. I guess, cousins or distant family members or neighbors or whatnot is fine.
As you may know, the users have voted to promote you to Discussion Moderator (if you are okay with it). This job comes with extra powers and responsibilities; in addition to moderating the forums, you will also be able to moderate chat (kick/ban users) and edit and delete article comments. Are you interested?
I asked in both the 721 and 722 thread, and no one seemed to notice, because so much is going on in those, which is why I made a thread specifically for it. But then you closed that, so I have still yet to see any of these supposed leaks, besides the one page of 721 and one page of 722. Is that all there is?
Just a little request. I know you already gave your two cents on the topic, but that's not so much about personal opinions. More about a topical discussion :)
It is about the rename Ursula pages thread. As you know, the thread is clearly and explicity about renaming the Ursula pages; but as some users tried to shift the discussion away, then some users are confused.
The most recent example is Matheus1234zx. Basically, he sais he agrees with the rename... while he mentions that he wants to keep Deity/Sea Witch as part of their names.
Clearly, a real confusion and problem about the real topic of the discussion is ongoing, so I was wondering if you could clean the messages unrelated to the discussion please ^^ I mean, I already asked people if they could stay focus on the real discussion, but that's not enough.