Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20160822181638/@comment-24268382-20160822191453

Applegirl wrote: As for my personal opinion on the thread, I still disagree with its creation because I do not feel the community at large understands what a bureaucrat position is for, aside from having a new wiki title and having more rights on a designated wiki. I feel the deciding factor and discussion of whether Killian should be a bureaucrat should be amongst staff members only, which includes admins, rollbackers, chat mods/image mods/forum mods, etc, because in this case, I do feel personal bias would play a factor in the votes Killian receives in his favor. What I'm getting at is the majority of the community has had largely positive interactions with Killian, however, this is very one sided. His negative behavior should be also considered with the same weight as his positive behavior in the decision of whether he is the right fit for the bureaucrat position, and this is an aspect I do not feel the community is that knowledgable enough about because they haven't seen this side of him. Therefore, I feel a staff members-only discussion about Killian's bureaucrat rights would be more appropriate.

How about educate the community about what a bureaucrat is instead of saying this should be left up to the people in charge (the people who teamed up and abused their power and started this whole mess). We ain't in North Korea - the people have a right to voice their opinions.