Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-91424-20160807191405/@comment-1916997-20160808004547

First of all, you guys can't say: "no one would find (insert category here) interesting". For every category you can come up with, I can find someone who will think it is interesting. Nightlily, you like furnuture and household items, so surely someone likes types of trees, and someone else likes types of cars, etc. Point is, we put these things in trivia for a reason, because they are trivial. But we can't say what trivia is interesting and what is not, because that is completly subjective. That all being said, I agree with others that it may be hard to sort what is a prop and what is a set dressing, without getting into major debates. It seems even the industry itself has some conflicting descriptions, so I don't know how we would differenciate. As far as keeping or adding new trivia, I am always for it, because as I said, I don't believe we can deside what is "nteresting and what is not.