Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26394456-20150714132009/@comment-26443838-20150717120727

Merida and The Dark Swan wrote: NickyHelp wrote: Merida and The Dark Swan wrote: NickyHelp wrote: Eskaver wrote: A bear can not be a credible villian. .We have witches that blast down ice vikings,  demons and the Darkness and somehow you think a bear would trouble them. Mor'du was once human? Why not the new villain? Besides, it can bbe a credible villain when it acts, fights, and kills like a demon. Just like Mor'du did. I hope that there will be no bear, like Eskaver said, Regina, Zelena and Emma can do amazing things with their magic, things a bear wouldn't be able to accomplish. The witches are just to powerful for a bear, that may seem like a demon to someone without magic, but like a dog to someone with magic. In the movie the bear is way bigger than regular bears, and way stronger then a regular one, but not strong enough for magic. Not every villain has to be magical to be powerful you know. King George wasn't powerful, but he is ruthless. And would any of you argue with that? King George was a villain without magic, but he had another kind of power, his kingdom. Which is why Regina didn't just kill him, which she could. A bear could also just be killed, and if he is a threat he would, he has no power compeared to the magical power of the witches. In brave he was a formideble villain because they had no magic, only swords and arrows, but in Storybrooke they have magic! The witch from Brave had magic. The Wisps seemed magical. And Brave does have magic. Do you remember that, or not?