Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27079851-20171120082917/@comment-1916997-20171129013050

Gidgetus does make one really good point, that all of you seem to be ignoring, WHook just met Rapunzel, so let's say Rapunzel was really the one in the tower, but she did the same thing Gothel did, use WHook to make a baby to free herself. Would that have been rape? It would really be Rapunzel, but she still slept with WHook under false pretenses. Like where do we draw the line? What if Gothel didn't physically glamour herself, but just lied and said she was Rapunzel? Is that rape? This is the important difference between what happened to Robin, and what happened to WHook. Robin was tricked into thinking he was sleeping with his wife. WHook was just tricked into thinking he was sleeping with a different woman he just met, than the one he did sleep with. So I do think we have to be really careful with how we interpet this, because we are going down a slippery slope, where almost every sexual encounter can be considered "rape".