Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-5817180-20170501022451/@comment-31619992-20170501162103

Eskaver wrote: Hera Pan wrote: 1. A curse that can banish everybody to a land without magic, that can enslave people to the wish of the person who casts it... Blue should broke it.

2. I know that the plot wasn't made at that time, but the writer's job is that all that they tell us make sense with the past. Specially in this show that use flashbacks.

4. Well is important for me, but I'm ok. Is not the thing I care the most.

Yes, that sounds logic. Rumple with the crystal ball. I buy it. 1. A curse like that could be useful. You may think "Of course, I would destroy it." I would say, "May be useful in the future." Plus, you're using future knowledge which Blue didn't know. We know what the DC does. Blue only knows a crazy woman she just banished just made a spell that noone can access unless they are a fairy. Blue doesn't even know if it works.

So, example. If someone crazy was just arrested and left a suspicious looking box behind, the first thing you do shouldn't be to destroy it.

2. The issue is you are using season 2 scenes, etc, and saying she should have told them. The writers can't go back in time or season 2 and change things (Swan Song showed us their attempt to do so and it was terribly retconny.) 1. Just 40/ 50 years later she knew Rumple was going to look for the curse. Of course, she said that he couldn't get it, but she sould destroyed it. Also, cast the curse needs that someone kills the most beloved person. A fairy asking for such thing? Inbelieveable.

2. I'm not saying that they had to retcon nothing from S2. I'm saying that they should wrote Rumple's savior prophecy otherwise.