Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4637931-20150728195657

So everyone's stories were re-written where the hereos are the villains and the villains are the hereos. However, I did notice that even as hereos, both Rumple and Zelena still maintained selfishness. Rumple was willing to kill an innocent boy and hero Regina so he can keep his happy ending. Zelena didn't care that Regina was dying and only cared about her dress and wedding day being ruined and eventually started to turn green. Here's my point. Do you think the message was that since Regina maintained a selfless hero willing to sacrifice herself to save a boy she "thinks" she doesn't know or care about and Snow and David were ruthless villains that that might have been their destiny? Like maybe being evil and selfish were Rumple's and Zelena's destinies? I mean in the real story, Snow and David stole an innocent baby to put their child's potential darkness into it and that was evil and they lied about it later on. It seems to me that they might have had a potential for being evil themselves. Maybe Regina was destined to be a true hero in both stories which is why she maintained her selfless hero status when she sacrificed her chance at true love to save someone who she thinks she doesn't know or really care about. She's also done her share of heroic deeds in the real world as well. Anyways, here's my short theory:

Could Snow, David, Rumple and Zelena have been destined to be selfish villains since they appeared to show selfish and/or evil acts in both stories and could Regina have always been destined to be a hero since she sacrificed herself and a chance at true love to save a boy she doesn't know and have done heroic deeds in the real world as well?

Sorry for my long and repeating self. lol 