Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20141126010024/@comment-25602483-20141128102229

NickM98 wrote: WinterWoodsGal wrote:

NickM98 wrote: I sumply said what I said as so many people are still confused and think that Pan's Curse was sucessful when it wasn't. I was never correcting you, merely agreeing with you. What I see as disrespectful is your crazed reaction to my comment which was agreeing with you all along.

Sidenote: If you're going to try and put forward a good argument, at least use proper English; "I did not say that Regina 'casted' the fourth curse" is not a good way to use grammar to support your point. Also, there was no fourth curse, to date there have been only three: Regina's (successful, later reversed), Pan's (stopped) and Snow's (current). You may be confused as Regina undid her curse in 3x11 "Going Home", she didn't cast a new one. Don't tell people about using proper English when you just wrote sumply. XD And yes that's what I've been saying, it was Regina, Pan (failed) then Snow. "Sumply" was just a small typo by me, my fingers must have slipped on my tablet. At least it wasn't intentional like "casted". Lol i'm using casted because if was the past tense of cast  search it up lol. just because some words u here are not often said jsut because we say it was cast rather than saying it was casted, does not mean its wrong, before you criitize grammar you should do your research just like some people don't think snuck is a past tense of sneak because they always use sneaked.

And in order to reverse something simply put you have to redo it. If you want to reverse a surgery you redo the same surgery to correct the same mistake, and in this case in order to reverse the curse you have to recast it. That is the price of the curse, otherwise if Regina did not have to cast it buy simply reverse it and counteract pan's curse, she shouldn't have said "I have to pay the price of the curse" which is to give up henry and go back to EF. And that dearie is a proper grammar.