Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-24863788-20151005171740/@comment-26184894-20151005183359

Eskaver wrote: Kingfan22 wrote: Eskaver wrote: Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: I don't see the need for it. Unless we get a transgender character, it's not really important to make a distinction between Gender and Sex. I say leave it as is. No need to change something unless we absolutely need to. And for now, we don't absolutely need to. I agree with this. There's no reason to change it for now.

Now for political correctness, yeah, but I always saw the Gender row to just be a description and not necessarily a physical detail. So, if we had a Dark fairy possesed Robin, we would then have to separate Gender and Sex based on physicality. Other than that, I see no dire need to change it. I don't get why one character will warrant that big of a change. I don't see the point in waiting because it most likely will be a minor character that we will only see once. I think it should either be done now or just not be done at all. I think it should be done because gender isn't a physical trait. There is no proof that such a character exists or will exist. That isn't or anywhere near my point. My point is I agree solely because the correct term is sex. Gender has nothing to do with the body. However, I see no point in waiting for one character to come to make a change this big. The character will most likely be minor and seen a couple of times. After that we will never see a transgender again. Why wait for one character.

I think it should be done because technically saying gender in physical trait is incorrect but I don't understand why a minor character will have this big a impact. I think it should either be done now or not at all because one minor character isn't that important.