Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-2153169-20171129175600/@comment-1916997-20180114145425

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: JennaMae wrote: IMDB has Cory Rempel as "Clayton." Interesting. Originally Tarzan is a Clayton as well, so this could actually be Tarzan (or maybe his cursed persona). The actor looks right for the role.

If anyone wants, here is the IMDB page:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4534019/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t11

And here is the page for the Tarzan story:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarzan_of_the_Apes

And here we go x)

Before we speculate too much, Disney lost the rights of Tarzan years ago. They can't use it. Well, I'm sure they could get the rights, if they really wanted. They got Peter Pan rights, even if it took a year. And Tarzan isn't something that is in that high of demand that the owner of the rights wouldn't be willing to give out rights for a tv show, especially if they get money for it. That's different. Not like they never had them. Disney LOST the rights. They had them, and they lost them. And they never tried to get them back since then, not even for a live-action... so I doubt they'd try to get them for OUAT x) Plus, as for now, the rights belong to Warner Bros. A film was just released in 2016, so nope. Disney did not get the rights back so soon, just for OUAT ^^

At best, the name will be a nod, like Rufio. But, it can't be an adaptation of Tarzan ^^

Disney never lost the rights to Peter Pan, they just need to be allowed to expand the character drastically ^^ From what I understand about Tarzan rights, the owner is very protective, so they don't just give the rights out, but "rent" them out per project. So (unless you have something that proves otherwise) Warner Bros. doesn't have the rights either, they were just given them to make a movie.