Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-34360784-20180116101248/@comment-1916997-20180119060911

Eskaver wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: It isn't speculation. Not only does WHook state as such, he has to have the same set of parents, unless the writers are doing a new take on how humans reproduce, which I don't think is the case. Clarification Take-2: You have WHook's statement, I have evidence of WR inconsistency. We both agree on that. We now go on precedent "Source, or nothing".

You can disagree on the precedent from the community discussion before, but I'm not debating biology and logical deduction because the wiki doesn't work that way. (Which doesn't satisfy everyone on everything, but that's how majority rule works) And there within lies the problem. We aren't using logic and basic biology. The writers aren't making a show for babies, they expect the audience to not need every little detail spoonfed to them. If they have a character say "our pasts are the same", and then have him say who his mother is, the writers expect us to understand that the other version of that character would also have the same mother. How people can't understand this is beyond me.