Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-26159109-20151217193854/@comment-26159109-20151218161815

NickyHelp wrote:

Farerb wrote:

Eskaver wrote: Farerb wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Farerb wrote: In my opinion, all these marketing tactics are ridiculus. They should just write a good show and people will watch it. GOT and TWD are not that marketable, but they became popular because of good writing. Season 1 was great because they had a story to tell, they had characters talking more than 30 seconds about emotions and not thrown into one action sequence after the other connecting them by vague explanations. Are you kidding me!?! Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead are not "that marketable"!?! First off, they are based off a book series and a comic book series respectively, which means they already had somewhat of a following of people before they even started the tv shows. Second, fantasy (with dragons) and horror (with zombies) are always highly marketable, as they are popular genres, and dragons and zombies are always very popular with people. Saying people only started watching these tv shows because they are well written is hilariously misinformed, and besides that, the way they are written is more a credit to George R.R. Martin and whoever writes the Walking Dead comics, then the shows writers, seeing as they are both adaptations. Before GoT, fantasy TV was not that marketable. It is known. Writing a book is different than putting it on screen, that credit belongs to the show's creators. I think it's a host of things. I'm more certain that fantasy was marketable, but fantasy and medieval politics, heavy of the worldbuilding was not. Well, at least since LOTR (which are movies) and SW (which are movies) in their popular forms.. Movies are different than TV. Though they're both media. Are they films as well or not? Marketing a high budget Hollywood film that is runtime is 3 hours is different than marketing a 10 1 hour episodes that's going to air over 10 weeks with less budget.