Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-4839682-20140320220703/@comment-1916997-20140324133428

Arctucrus wrote: FrancisPaul wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: I'm against any merging for the time being. Also, if everyone else in "the missing year" is going by their EF identities it should count as Bae, not Neil. Finally, regarding my idea (it's CoolDudeAl, not CoolAlDude, btw, lol), I thought we had a good consenus that everyone wanted to change the EF counterparts to deceased to match the SB counterparts. Several people said they liked the idea, and no one has objected so far. Besides, at this point shouldn't they match, seeing as we counted everyone as reverted to EF counterparts for "the missing year", and if you were dead before that year, you were dead during that year. I'm okay with that, but you seem to be one of very few people who want it. There's the whoel he-was-not-cursed-so-undoing-the-curse-would-not-change-his-identity point of view... What FrancisPaul said. The first Curse did not turn Bae into Neal, he did that of his own accord, so why should its' undoing be on Bae's page and not Neal's?

That's the only way it makes sense. Nothing makes sense right now, the most important being we have no concrete way to say which character gets multiple pages or when characters are counted as being in a different "form".