Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-169.234.63.6-20130301024211/@comment-71.193.218.64-20130315142455

Aqua Mare wrote: I feel like that still means she could be from our world. She could still be a fairytale character, but orginated in our world. Why wouldn't they say "accent" along with it? Not trying to argue with you, but if that's they're process, that's stupid to me. Any way, If OUaT isn't doing Peter Pan (at least not now) I don't think they'd have a Wendy. They said they couldn't get the rights to it, I think that means characters, if you notice they never call Hook "Captain" Hook, and they changed his name and personality. I feel like they don't have the rights to use the characters how they are in the story. Also, I said it on another page too, Peter ends up together with Wendy's grandaughter, Peter ending up with Moira was an invention for the movie 'Hook'. It did not exist in the original novel or in the animated movies, so I doubt they'd recycle it into OuaT. Disney would probably have to work out some kind of a deal with Paramount, and with all of the other writing possibilities, I doubt that they'd go to the trouble after all of these years just for one that one plot angle. The episodes names of "Second Star to the Right" and "Straight On Til Morning" more or less confirm that they have, in fact, acquired the rights to Peter Pan. OutT is essentially one big Disney production in the first place, so I doubt that the rights to any Disney stories or characters would be impossible for OuaT writers to get. Perhaps someone just said that to keep the fans guessing...?