Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-24674051-20141226231107

In the discussion for the new template for the Graphic Novels, there seems to be a difference of opinion on how to handle the novel Reawakened. Since that discussion is not relevant to the consensus on the new template for the graphic novels, I am starting a thread to handle any overflow discussion for that topic.

I think, as far as the canonicity (is that a word?) of Reawakened goes, here is the question to ask. Does it provide any additional detail that is not already covered in season 1? If it does not, then it really doesn't matter whether it is considered canon or not, since it just reiterates other information already contained, and therefore does not really warrant a seperated section. A bullet point is more than sufficient.

If, on the other hand, there is additional information contained that was not presented in season 1, we have to respect that writers have declared this as a non-canon work, and treat it accordingly. (actually, we should do this anyway since the writers have stated that it is non-canon.  this argument is just for those that are suggesting that it be included since it is just a novelization of Season 1).

So, in either case, there is really no point in adding a section for reawakened. The other Graphic novels do present additonal information and character development, and have been declared as canon by the writers, so deserve the seperate attention.

Just my 2 cents. Feel free to agree or disagree. 