Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20171014023101/@comment-24304025-20180506133233

NickM98 wrote: FrancisPaul wrote: About the infobox, I have a question I don't understand.

Zelena's current page, for instance, has the BothCounterparts template. The "Cursed" and "Original" lables allow us to change the infobox pic by clicking either of them.

Johanna's page, for instance, has the BothCounterparts template, but just one infobox pic.

EQ/RM/Roni's merged page, for instance, has the three infobox names (once the code is fixed, we can change the infobox pic by clicking EQ, RM or Roni.

My questions are:

1) Once everything is merged, the BothCounterparts template will disappear, right? Zelena and Johanna, for instance, will have similar infoboxes with one color (their original world) but multiple infobox pictures, which we can switch by clicking the top lable. Is it correct?

2) The way the infobox works in Zelena's current page, the "Cursed' and "Original" lables get darker when selected, so it is visually easy to notice that you can click either of them. This doesn't occur in WHook/Rogers for instance. If I didn't know that I can click WHook or Rogers to change the pic, it would seem that the first pic is the only one. Not sure if I explained it clearly.

What do you guys think? Yes this appears to be the intent.

I brought up the issue of colouring the tabs to show which infobox image is being displayed, but received no response. I'm reposting my tab colouring suggestion below (made with Paint to visualise my suggestion).

I would like a mix of options 2 and 3.
 * Current: name at top and large image tabs
 * Once coding is fixed: no name at top, large image tabs only (I've photo-edited the screencap to correct the colours for when the coding is fixed)
 * My suggestion: name at top and smaller image tabs (note: infobox colour should highlight whichever tab is open)

I believe there should be no name at top, and yet colouring the tabs seems neccessary.

If we need a name at top to make that work, then I would go back to my previous suggestion.