Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-4975807-20150427164031/@comment-26159109-20150429033611

CoolDudeAl wrote: Utter solitude wrote: The consensus is already forming on a simpler rule. "Do they have a new identity?" Is a good litmus test with no or few exceptions. Frankly, all or nothing doesnt really work, there will always be exceptions.

The way pages are handled when they went back to the EF was decided at the time, everything reverted to their EF page, as the script called them by their former names. Hook only has one page, and Neal was an exception as he was an adult and still referred to as Neal. The problem with this is we have seen aspects of the new identity. Eric being a fisherman is from his cursed identity, as is Bo Peep being a butcher. Also, it's implied everyone in the first curse was given a false name, etc., we just haven't heard it because we never had a need to. My suggestion is that if we know they were a victim of the first curse, they should still have a split page. I'm fine with characters we know weren't part of the first curse being put all on one page though (so Robin, Aurora, etc.). Eric being a fisherman is not a new aspect of false identity, its just a new job. I think it is not necessary to have a new page just to say he is a fisherman now. Again, I've said it, we need to stop thinkning about the dark curse and say if we as the viewers saw a different character, in Eric's case, we didn't.