Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-6302057-20160319063517/@comment-2153169-20160319070308

Now I get the problem.

The problem in your suggestion Nick is that a lot of your "facts" are wrong, but also you're mixing differents notions.

First of all, Alexandra has never been taken back to EF in 311. This is a supposition that you're doing cos of Regina's dialogue. Sure, she prolly went back but it is a supposition so not a fact. We can"t use it

For Neal, well also a problem. Henry was included in the alternate universe. The alternate universe had two parts. The first one where Henry woke up: empty SB, in a LWM where Isaac was a successful author. The second part was the world in Isaac's book. Saying that Henry was not included in the alternate universe cos not an EF origin is not an argument, it is a mistake. Henry was not included because he was not born in a magical realm. He was born in the LWM, at Phoenix. Neal was born at SB, which is a magical land in the LWM. Different cases, so different points.

Then, the problem of your wording. From what I am reading, you're mixing different notions. Because Neal's and Alexandra's conceptions happened in the EF, it makes them EF origin so EF characters? Well, that's wrong.

An origin is not determined by the country of your conception. When people are talking about their country of origin, they are either talking of the country where they were born or the country where they were raised as children. In any case, people are talking about the country of their conception. Admitting your conception happened in Germany, does it mean that Germany is your country of origin, or it is the country where you were born? Of course, it is the second one. What's important in the origin of someone (and a character), is the place of its birth, not the place where its parents did sex to have it.

So both Neal and Alexandra are SB characters and origin, and not EF. So we don't need the split counterpart template for them :)