Board Thread:Rant and Rave/@comment-25491743-20180209181244/@comment-1916997-20180401172122

DeviousPeep wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote:

TheRose123 wrote: Eskaver wrote: I take issue in part with that statement because you can’t call Neal/Emma a headcanon, as they were a thing and the show was hinting towards it (unlike Swan Queen). I think the reason why Swan Queen fans are disappointed in the writers is because if it was a heterosexual relationship then it would have happened, given the progression of their story. I don't think if Emma had been Emerson and Henry's biological father, that would automatically mean that he and Regina would have been in a relationship. Honestly, I'm pretty good at picking up when characters are supposted to have feelings for each other (and probably better at picking up homosexual pairings than heterosexual ones), and I honestly never saw the pairing between Emma and Regina being shown in show. I thought the chemistry was there, but I never thought the writers would actually go for it. I think this is more that Lana has chemistry with everyone. Because she has it with everyone, I never read into it as specifically a thing with Emma.