Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25926288-20150507190713/@comment-1916997-20150510020248

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Guys, read between the lines. He said should be, just in case they plan on retconing a deleted scene with an actual episode scene later, so basically it is canon until proven otherwise.

No, basically not canon until proven otherwise. This retco thing is not necessary true, and I'm gonna re use an argument of Eskaver: ""Should be" leaves a bit of uncertainty, when they could easily give a confirmation." Clearly, he said "should be" when he could easily said "they are". So yeah, not sure ^^ Well, we are just inturpeting the "should be" in different ways. I'm seeing it as "yes, they are canon unless we say otherwise, either blatenly or by retconing something in an actual episode" and your seeing it as "no, they are not canon unless we say otherwise, either blatenly or by confirming something in an actual episode". We both get basically the same thing, I just have canon answers to things like "where did Rumple get the knife he tried to give Bae?" or "how come Regina wasn't suspicous of Ingrid when she came to town?", while you don't. Either way, they were deemed not important enough to actually appear in the episode, so we probably shouldn't worry about it too much.