Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1916997-20150926141249/@comment-26159109-20150926205919

CoolDudeAl wrote: Farerb wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Farerb wrote:

Anyway, the information provided by the book is not enough to create a page. A note in the Disney references page is more than enough. Can you tell me how you can affirm that? Did you read it? Yes I have. Having just two characters from the film is not enough (just like Cinderella and Rapunzel were not). The book was not even a rendition of The Fox and The Hound, which is about two peole that struggle to have a friendship because society decided that they should be against each other. So it is nice to have characters from that story blended in, but the whole theme of TFATH was not in the book, and the characters by themselves do not deserve a whole page, if so then Cinderella and Tangled should have one as well. Like Red and Peter? Violet doesn't want them together, Granny doesn't want them together, etc. I agree Cinderella should have a movie page, I made a thread about it already. Tangled, I'm not so sure, we didn't have anything that directly linked to Tangled, if we had Flynn or Pascal or even Rapunzel in a purple dress than maybe, but we didn't. It's not about certain people that don't want them to be together because Reasons. It's about the norm that sociey decided (society is more than few people) about what who they should be that contradicts them being friends with each other. A real world example is if an israeli and a palestinian develop friendship, but they can't be friends because society decided that they should fight each other. It's not about your parents approving your boyfriend.