Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1894786-20151107225625/@comment-1916997-20151108234603

Eskaver wrote: Killian Jones wrote: Yes, I know what you mean, but that's not what I'm talking about. We know that most of what happened in the movie happened. But we can't be judges of what happened and what didn't. Did the characters sing all the songs? Was Elsa's mother Iduna, or was it Gerda? Did Olaf speak? Did Rapunzel go to Arendelle? This. With so many facts that say otherwise, the in-show would be taken over the words of the writers.

Now in Brave's case, there's not enough information to tell. It can't be exactly compared to Frozen which changed names and other things. It all depends on what we see, but the basic assumption could either be:

--Assume the events of the movie happened based on Word of Writers, changing the discrepancies to fit what happened in-show, or

--Use only things presented in-show

I would go with the "Less is More" approach so that way there is no error or speculative proof. It's better to have facts, rather than speculation. If there's speculation to be allowed than it's not really helpful (unless it's in trivia) What I have suggested is a less is more approach. One statement, that's it. No fighting over singing, mother's names, Olaf, easter eggs, etc.