Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-26211594-20151009183748/@comment-4427410-20151009205523

So. . . in order for us to accept Regina as a "good" person, she has to lose her sharp tongue, sarcasm and possess no negative qualities whatsoever? What is she supposed to be? A Kewpie doll? Is that the only way we're supposed to believe she is good?

Regina is still blaming others for her mistake, still doing the "ends justify the means", and lack of self-awareness.

SO WHAT? Of course, she's going to retain some of her less than pleasant traits. That is what makes her a person and not some damn Marble model.

I thought Regina was supposed to be a complex person and not some ideal "Disney princess" with no negative qualities whatsoever. It seems as if you don't want her to be complex. You want her to be some goody-goody with no character flaws whatsoever. Snow and David possess personal flaws. And they can be negative, at times. That doesn't mean that they're evil. Or do you demand that they be some one-dimensional goody-goody type, as well?

What is with this black-and-white morality nonsense?