Thread:FrancisPaul/@comment-5679696-20161212154837/@comment-5679696-20161214025132

Lily, you can't conveniently switch between textbook definitions and our policies randomly to suit your every argument.

When Lady brings up a text book definition of how canon works, you recur to our policies' definition. But when you use the term consensus outside of how our policies define it (5 votes minimum for images/quotes, more votes for more important decisions), you recur to an external text book definition? You know how our consensus works, so were you deliberately calling a 4-2 result a consensus, when you know very well that in the context of the wiki anyone would take it as a 5+ agreement?

And besides, another text-book definition for consensus is "general agreement or concord; harmony.", which was definitely not the case.