Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-34924658-20171024194401/@comment-34924658-20180125193605

Lady Junky wrote: Tysonjackson wrote:

Lady Junky wrote:

So yeah, I'll stick with this idea. We should just end it, and not put the Disney part in the intro sentence. Not until we have a source from a writer. I don’t know about everyone else, but I don’t wanna just call it quits and give you what you want. Our side may not have been winning, but we were definitely tied at the least. So our opinion matters just as much as yours.

Loool. And I'm the childish one? xD

Plus, you don't seem to know about what you're talking about, or you did not follow the discussion? What I really want is to add the info as an allusion. But, because of this discussion, this is as impossible as adding that she is based on.

Which leave us two possibilities. We wait and continue the discussion, OR we take a third way and we just add nothing in the intro sentence. That may not please everyone, but at least, it will not please one side over the other.

What you still don't get is that it is not a question of which side is winning or not. As of today, we can't add that she is an allusion or based on yet. So yeah, except these two possibilities that I just mentioned, there is not much we can do. You’re the only one who mentioned the word “childish”. And no, the origin of this was whether or not she was based on or not. Some people may have started talking about allusions but the original discussion was is she based on Anastasia Tremaine or just the fairytale stepsister.