Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-28162607-20170103120839/@comment-28162607-20170106235754

Nightlily wrote:

Aine1989 wrote:

The in show information suggesting 2000 is Henry's biological age. It's not like they haven't messed up with timestampts before. Then I really don't see the point in continuing this conversation, since you've already been presented with all the evidence to the contrary, again and again; yet you refuse to budge. Now, you are, of course, free to believe whatever you want, but this wiki views the year 2001 as well established and correct, and will continue to do so. I have actually provided canon evidence several times and yet you have refused to listen to me and think that a throwaway Lost reference is more important than 6 seasons of Henry's established age.

And regardless of 16 or 17, she was a child and Neal was an adult. That is sexual abuse. And just creepy. Emma was in no way mature enough to consent to sex, let alone sex with an adult (especially when you think about the power imbalance between the two)

[|But here]

[|More pictures! (This time with a 23 year old MRJ0]