Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-2153169-20140516005552/@comment-4975807-20140709212303

I can the good of keeping the affiliations, but everything gets blurred when we try to judge (as the show audience) of who is a villain/former villain, a hero/former hero or neutral/ formerly neutral. Now I see how confusing that can get because not the entire fanbase of OUAT views each character's affiliation the same way. Some people will still see Regina as a villain even though her current actions show she has reformed in many ways. Some people will perceive Rumplestiltskin/Mr. Gold as not a villain, but an anti-hero for his questionable actions. I think the spectrum is just too vast for us to factually categorize characters into affiliations when they are constantly changing sides or may change sides in the future.