Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4427410-20151212194212/@comment-26159109-20151213075737

CTrent29 wrote: ''Emma's role as the Savior has been, and will always be, to return the happy endings.... that is it. Part of that, is to inspire others to to become their best selves. This is how I have always viewed Emma's destiny. ''

Emma has a "destiny" because Rumpelstiltskin needed her as a tool to break the first curse. That's it. That's all. And I wish to God that Kitsis and Horowitz had dropped that "Savior" nonsense after the Season One finale, when they should have in the first damn place. I always thought she was supposed to be Buffy-like, but they always reduced her role as the savior to allow Gold and Regina "redeem" themselves, then they pretend that didn't happen and give their attributes to Emma (for example, Hook telling her she defeated Pan and Zelena while it isn't true) and that is what bothers me the most. They think that they can show one thing and tell us another and somehow both are true, which they're not.