Board Thread:Rant and Rave/@comment-28162607-20180220221000/@comment-25926288-20180223233142

Touli2 wrote: Eskaver wrote: Leaving falsehoods on with speculation is not conducive to this discussion.

Emma was 17 with no evidence countering that. It’s false to say 16, 17, or 18, because there is no equivalence.

Emma and Henry’s birthday is already known. It’s false to speculate on their birthdays when we know them. It’s false to consider them to be the same day when there is overwhelming evidence that when they are and that they are not on the same day.

Words have meaning and the term pedophile shouldn’t be used in this conversation and is not being discussed here. If what was meant was the law, then it is without a doubt against the law of Oregon.

We cannot have substantive discussion when falsehoods are continuously discussed as if it were true. Lily has been displaying the key timeline events and notes on when this or that happened and we discussed the law amongst other things.

Let’s focus on the totality of facts, context, and discuss this genuinely. I did not know Emma and Henry's birthdays were given. Can you show me where?

Im sorry for using the p word, i simply do not know how else to put it. Emma’s birthday is Oct 22 and Henry’s is August 15. You can check their page and it’ll show all the citations and sources.

The “p” word is missed used simply because it doesn’t mean what people think it means. In any case, someone in their early twenties falling for someone 17 isn’t when you can use that word (since literally months later, it would be totally legal everywhere).