Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-27060727-20160929050506/@comment-1916997-20161115033306

Queenofdarkness89 wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Saintfighteraqua wrote: Ozma is a fairy...but I really doubt they'll delve very much into Oz lore beyond the first book. As someone who has read all 14 Oz books by Baum, Ozma is definitly not a fairy. She is a girl and a princess of Oz. just seen this and as someone who has read most of the 40 some  canonical oz books wriiten by baum and his family. she is a fairy or at least part and shes not a princess of oz she is the queen but goes by the title of princess ozma. she is a descendant of lurline the fairy.... but we are getting off topic. i have a feeling this episode has to do more with baby morpheus,

Just double checked, and the origin on Ozma varies, based on which book you are using. However, while at some points Baum refers to her as a fairy, I think he is using that word to mean what we would now call "fae". Fae are a variety of magical creatures, and a fairy, as it is shown on Once, would be just one type of fae. So she could be described as a fae, but I don't see her being depicted as a fairy. Anyway, I don't think we will see Ozma any time soon (if at all), so it is of little importance. As for your point, I agree Morpheus will be the focus of the present day plot, but a flashback may focus on the fairies.