Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1894786-20151107225625/@comment-11464223-20151108161138

Farerb wrote: I disagree with what you suggested. I think it's better not to write anything at all than start with what we assume happened from the movie because, firstly It's not that accurate. Secondly, it will start unnecessary arguments between users that have different opinions on what happened or what didn't happen from the films. Elaborate.

For the record though, I never said it was "that accurate." I simply suggested it was the "most accurate" we were going to get. And I still think it is.

Of course if there were a better option, I would jump on it. I just don't think there is one, because these are special cases and so it naturally follows that things are going to have to bend a little bit.

Seriously though, I challenge someone to come up with something better. :/

Also... How would it cause arguments between users that argued as to what did or didn't happen in the movies?? What happened in the movies happened and what didn't happen didn't, there's no "opinion" when it comes to events. >_<