Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26237024-20150728194734/@comment-4427410-20150730033951

Emma was going to stop Lily in the wrong way. . . just as she "saved" Henry in the wrong way - with anger and homicide on the brain. In Henry's case, if he had not ducked, he would have fallen over that cliff with Cruella. Emma seemed unaware of this in her determination to kill Cruella. Violence is not always the way to solve problems, especially if there are other ways to do it. I get the feeling that people don't realize this or that they don't want to.

Neal originally stole it. Emma tried to steal it from him. Both are guilty. And Emma could have turned over the WV bug to the Portland police after she got out of prison. Isn't that where they stole the VW? Instead, she kept it and judging from her conversation with Regina in "Darkness at the Edge of Town", she seemed to have no remorse over the fact that the VW is a stolen vehicle.

Are you willing to accept the idea of Emma being morally ambiguous. . . without the benefit of an evil entity possessing her body?