Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-4839682-20140320220703/@comment-1916997-20140322213111

Applegirl wrote: FrancisPaul wrote: Applegirl wrote: I'm for merging the Baelfire/Neal and Pinocchio/August pages. For after "Undone Curse", Neal is Neal. For everything "Before the Curse" up to the point he escaped Neverland and (presumably) assumed the name Neal Cassidy, he would still be Baelfire. I think Pinocchio/August would follow similarly. He came to the LWM as a young Pinocchio, but somewhere along the way, assumed a different name at an older age. They were never cursed. Can I move the summaries then from Bae to Neal?

Also, I'm changing status to deceased in those characters, since you agreed on it. I noticed you changed the information on Bae/Neal's pages already, but I rollbacked because I still feel it's a bit questionable of whether we actually have a "consensus" or not. I don't think myself giving an opinion dictates as a final that the information should be changed right away, and I didn't want to give that impression in case other people still disagree, so I believe the topic should be discussed further. How about everyone state yes or no if they are for or against the Baelfire/Neal and Pinocchio/August page merges, and yes or no to counting Neal as still Neal, and not Baelfire, under the events of "After Undone Curse"?

I do agree with CoolAlDude's previous comment about counting the EF counterparts as deceased if their SB counterparts are also deceased, but again, I didn't want my one "yes" approval to count as something that warrants immediate edit changes, so just for the sake of the community, I think we should agree to the change by majority. I'm against any merging for the time being. Also, if everyone else in "the missing year" is going by their EF identities it should count as Bae, not Neil. Finally, regarding my idea (it's CoolDudeAl, not CoolAlDude, btw, lol), I thought we had a good consenus that everyone wanted to change the EF counterparts to deceased to match the SB counterparts. Several people said they liked the idea, and no one has objected so far. Besides, at this point shouldn't they match, seeing as we counted everyone as reverted to EF counterparts for "the missing year", and if you were dead before that year, you were dead during that year.