Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-34924658-20171024194401/@comment-2153169-20180125073106

Tysonjackson wrote: There is no calling it even because there is no even ground in this discussion. She’s either listed as based on or she’s not. Pretty simple, we can’t do it both ways. Last time I checked, based on was the majority by like 2. But we can do a recount just to be sure? However, i don’t think we should continue much longer with this discussion. It’s been four months already.

And that it is what you did not get in this discussion. This is not your pov or nothing. The point is not "list as based on or not". The point is "list as allusion or based on". That's not the same thing, and that it is why I am bringing the third way: we just don't list it.

Also, you're the one who said we were even, then like one side is suddenly winning... So yeah, what's going on with the counting exactlty? How the number of votes is changing is no one is voting?

As I mentioned it already, we definitely can't call consensus a so divisive decision, with so many people involved in it. Clearly, whatever we're doing, basically half of the voters are not satisfied. A consensus is meant to be a clear majority... And there is no clear majority for whatever is the side.

If the discussion is taking so long, then it will take time. Not our fault if we don't agree on this. This is not meant to be a race.