Board Thread:Show-Related Questions and Answers/@comment-27094327-20151019041819/@comment-25926288-20151019151007

Trainer Green wrote: f the sands of Avalon are basically an illusion in a bottle doesnt't that mean it shouldn't have any effect on people? As in, it shouldn't change the way a person acts it should only change the way they are seen by the person who used them. And if Arthur is so obsessed with making the sword whole but apparently isn't afraid to use shortcuts, why the hell doesn't he just use the sand on the sword anyway? He already used it on his wife and entire kimgdom. Another thing, doesn't ANYONE else find it at least the slightest bit suspicious that the Kingdom got mafically restored just like that? Why is Lancelot the only one with common sense in all of Camelot? The sands "fix" things. Anything. So, Arthur used it on the Vilaige to "fix" it into the castle or the unbroken kingdom it should be. He used it to fix the people and used the dust to "fix" his relationship with Guinevere.

That's why noone noticed because Arthur basically have them all drugged into being the way Arthur wants them to be.

The Sword he wasn't to use to destroy the Darkness. The dust makes it appear fixed, but not actually fixes anything.

Lancelot left before the dust spread and he could relaize that a castle can't come out of nowhere. (Worldbuilding wise, shouldn't the neighboring kingdoms and noblemen realize that a castle randomly appreasred and all this stuffed popped out of nowhere.