Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-11464223-20151109020125/@comment-11464223-20151109022113

Arctucrus wrote: Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote:

But yeah, they need to clarify the timeline since in The Apprentice, it's established both the Aprrentice and Merlin are 1000's of years old. Not even 1,000. 1000's, which implies 2000 or more. I feel like that could be retconned easily as Merlin and the Apprentice having become the stuff of legend so much so that the legends about them have become (can't think of the word...) over-something-or-other. Like over-done but not quite. IDFK. Overdramatic? Distorted truths?

Something like that. Words are failing me right now.

Also, the episode felt rushed -- that's more what I meant earlier.

Anyone else get that feeling? :/