Talk:List of Lost References/@comment-31722073-20181105125834

Can we add a disclaimer to the top of this to the gist of “Due to the fact that many of the lost numbers are extremely common it is very likely that many or even most of their occurrences are coincidences and not meant to be a connection to Lost” because we can’t be sure which uses are references and which are coincidence but it feels weird to say that every single use of the numbers is definitely a reference.