Board Thread:Off-Topic Fun/@comment-24863788-20150712021406/@comment-1894786-20150908005056

Eskaver wrote: Well, I don't think it really matters since Disney doesn't define the racial standards of casting i.e. Rapunzel wasn't white, like in Tangled, so the argument is a bit of a moot point when she appeared before Elsa, Anna, and a few others. (Yeah, I know, Elsa's a Queen).

Also, popularity isn't as important as we might think because I think most would take Mulan over Aurora anyday, lol. Maleficent topples the Evil Queen anyday of the week in terms of Disney Marketing and how often they utilize her as the head honcho most times.

I don't want to see Tiana and I'll settle for an original character over the Disney version. Mostly because I don't want fictional 1960s or whatever timeframe Tiana's in to be a world and they usually are better when they are creative. Rapunzel's fear of herself and her responsibilities was great and better than if they copy and pasted the Disney version.

Jasmine isn't really neccesary at this point. I would sort of expect her not to be shown unless through a random flashback. I think the idea was likely to introduce her in Wonderland or whatever followed it; however, it was not meant to be.

Historical people need to stay away from Once because they don't really need any backlash. They may say that any publicity is good publicity, but I rather not. Plus,........Random Native American realm, lol.

Now, in my perspective, only Jasmine has a faint possibility, but I think there will be a Disney marketing hiatus on Once. They mentioned Brave and Frozen and Cruella and Ursula before they aired in the season or two. I don't see any other catching their eye, just yet. Tiana is 1920's New Orleans. She's also married to a Prince of a made up country that's said to be near Turkey. So she could be in Cruella's 1920's England world as a visiting royal.