Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-34924658-20170919184815/@comment-2153169-20170927193506

Tysonjackson wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Tysonjackson wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Killian Jones wrote: I think the tweets make it clear that there is no relation between Clorinda/Tisbe and Drizella/Anastasia. Any similarity is a coincidence and could be noted in the trivia, in my opinion. Then, we're back at the original situation? We just keep "based on the Evil Stepsis from the fairytales"; we delete any Disney-related part from that intro, and we explain everything in the trivia section. Disagree with this. Like I said, they don't correspond specifically with one of them but they are still based from Anastasia and Drizella. There was no Lady Tremaine in the original story, that's from Disney. So just by that they are based on Anastasia and Drizella.

Not because the mother is based on the Disney character, that it is the same for her daughters. Jane tweeted kind of proved it. And you're wrong, if they were based on Ana and Drizella, as you said, we would not have this discussion. Actually you're wrong. We're having this discussion because you argued that Clorinda was Anastasia. And yes, if their mother is based on the Disney character, then by default they are too. Even if just by that point. We don't have it listed as "Clorinda is based on this specific stepsister from Cinderella", we have it listed as based on the Evil Stepsisters. I see no problem with just doing that for the Ana/Drizella part as well.

I'm not here to play your little sick game on who's wrong.

The tweet - the one you asked yourself  - made it pretty clear. They have no relation to the Disney characters. In their creative process, they have never been thought as related to the Disney characters. As Killian said it himself, that is a clear point from Jane.

So, now the question is simple: either we're ignoring Jane or not. But, we're not going to adapt what she is saying to make it fit to some personal opinions.