Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25926288-20171216140636/@comment-34397172-20180120162021

CoolDudeAl wrote: TIAB1234 wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: TIAB1234 wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: TIAB1234 wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: TIAB1234 wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: ByHerm. wrote: And why not??? We have no proof any of the Camelot characters exist in NEF. They could, but seeing as Camelot already had a whole half season arc, I don't think it is likely. To be real and fair, the Camelot folks do not have to be involved in it if Madam Mim is one of th witches. Remember, when Lancelot first appeared, the rest of the Camelot folks were not involved. He appeared single. And some characters from different storybooks like Tiger Lily appeared very late signly when after the Neverland arc was over, and yet she was used for different storylines. Same thing for Cora the Queen of Hearts when they hardly had the other Wonderland cast involved in her story. Madam Mim isn't really from Arthurian Legend anyway. She was from a book that was loosly based on Arthurian Legend, but she was an original character. Doesn't matter. She was still involved with some of the Arthurian cast in the book she appeared in. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Once_and_Future_King#Characterization_in_the_work That's close enough. I'm aware, but she isn't from traditional Arthurian legend, which was my point. You never made any points on me because I never said anything about her being related to or from original the arthurian legend. Camelot is from Arthurian Legend, so yeah you did. Wrong again. Didn't you read carefully enough? I never said Mim was related to the Arthurian legend. I said Camelot cast (as in some of the characters) appeared in the book with her. It did not mean I was saying that they are related. So I didn't mean You got me all wrong. Let's drop it. You don't need to be condesending. If people are having trouble understanding you, maybe you aren't expressing your points clearly enough. I was expressing my points clearly.