Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25926288-20160418005754/@comment-25926288-20160422152621

CoolDudeAl wrote: Frulna wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Eskaver wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: You guys realize stuff like this happens on most tv shows and movies series (sometimes even a singular movie), right? Everyone making it sound like Once is terrible while all other shows and movies are perfect. And Once has a better explaination then most things have for things when something is wonky... magic. If something doesn't make sense, assume it has a magical answer. Like Zelena not having the shoes when she goes to the Underworld, maybe Zelena has a pouch of holding, and the shoes were in there. I tell you, Zelena's a RPG protagonist XD. As I said, the episode saying Red using a shread of Dorothy's clothing to travel to Zelena makes literally no sense as it contradicts everything we've seen so far. Try and explain that. Especially when we have had Zelena explain that to guide it "you'll need something to point it in the right direction". Dorothy's dress deals nothing with Zelena. It's a plot twist. That is actually one of Zelena's dresses, and when Dorothy came back to Oz, she came across an abanonded cottage (Zelena's former home) and found the dress and took it for herself. However, since it was stolen, the proper owner is still Zelena. Thus, the locator spell goes to Zelena. Am I good at this or what. Adam and Eddy should hire me. XD I can do one better, when Zelena ripped the dress she was the last to touch it during the battle and she ended up winning the battle. The winning of the item in battle made that ripped piece of dress change ownership from Dorothy to Zelena. That could work as well. Zelena's trophy from winning the battle is the torn piece of dress. See everyone, we can explain almost anything, we just have to try. We're not the ones that are suppose to headcanon explantions when they don't make sense. It's fun, but not our job.