Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-34360784-20180116101248/@comment-24304025-20180119131308

CoolDudeAl wrote: FrancisPaul wrote:

3) Ages vary. History vary. Why should we pretend that anything remained the same then? Apparently, there are still seven dwarves, but no WHappy. I mean, the whole WR is probably one of the hugest plot holes in history, but the wiki can't use that as an excuse to treat information as it suits better or more "comfortable". The policies and logics state that nothing can be added unless we have a source. That alone should be enough for us to avoid including any information that was not explicitly presented. About names, let's remember that the subjects didn't even know David's name in EF (as proved in 213), because he went by James. Yet, 611 shows that he was already called Prince David in WR. So, anyone could argue that Alice could be an alias because she was wanted for murder or whatever. She could be known as Alice there and actually be named Gertrude in EF. Who knows? Forgot to mention earlier, we didn't see WHappy or WDopey, but it doesn't mean they don't exist, just that we didn't see them. Sure, that is true. Doesn't invalidate my point, though