Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24892318-20140523071906/@comment-24892318-20140525225906

Edt997 wrote:

Ktmae1234 wrote:

Edt997 wrote: if emma and hook are true loves then it MUST be that everyother couple that fell in love are true lovers including the couples above.

This is absolute false logic.

how?

It's a fallacy of relevance. It analyzes an argument and and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, it's conclusion must be true. For example, all cats are animals. Ginger is an animal. Therefore Ginger is a cat.

once again you can't twist the situation no matter how you feel about what he did in rumple eyes he felt he was avenging his son and was doing what was right. again what MOST people would do.

Rumble chose revenge over love. That's not TL.

'''are you a writer for the show? if not who are you to directly contradict what the show has stated. even the writers said rumple loved belle. you yourself in the original post said they had true love'''

No, I quite clearly called bullshit on them having TL. Rumble may love her but he doesn't respect her and her continually chooses dark magic over her.

if we follow your logic hook didn't love emma by going back to the ef and resuming his life as a pirate.

Hook went back to the EF because the of the curse enacted by Peter Pan. He had no choice.

but did he have to become a pirate again?

What would you have him do? Hook was trying to forget Emma. He thought he was never going to see her again. He had a broken heart. If you recall in "The Jolly Roger", he couldn't even be with the bar wench. As soon as he had the chance to be with her, he sold the thing he loved most in the world to get back to her.