Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20150815191329/@comment-2153169-20150817010658

Right now, we're talking about where is "Kansas" for Dorothy and Walsh. We should not forget that the sentence from "The Doctor" is about the slippers. There is no mention of a girl or a man in this sentence. Only the slippers. We can't know for sure that the slippers are still in Dorothy's possession. We have zero proof or zero element which can confirm, or even hint, that Dorothy has still the slippers. Saying that the sentence from "The Doctor" can also includes Dorothy is as speculative as all the theories on this thread.

Again, the sentence is about the slippers not Dorothy. Yeah, the sentence confirms that the slippers are in LWM. But it is also the case of Dorothy? Impossible to say. We don't know what happened to her, or even if Zelena really let her come back in her Kansas. She could have send her to somewhere else? I agree with Killian on this one: when we see/read 205 & 320, and when we see all theories about Kansas on this thread, well it kinda proves that it is impossible to say for sure what is Kansas. Kansas from LWM? Kansas from LWC? Kansas as its own world? Eveything and all arguments are speculative in this discussion, none of them are 100% sure, so we should not add them as a "fact" on Dorothy's page when it is clearly not the case. It is kinda unprofessional.

Then. From my point of view, there is not a real discussion for Walsh. Even if we agree to say that Dorothy is from LWM (which does not seem to be case right now), we still can argue that we don't have a proof that Walsh and Dorothy are from the same Kansas. Just look England for exemple; we have three different England in the canon of our show. We can easily imagine that there is another Kansas somewhere. Saying Walsh's Kansas = Dorothy's Kansas is a big speculation from us. So yeah, to me, the discussion about Walsh is kinda over? We can prove anything about his Kansas, and saying he is from LWM cos "Dorothy is from LWM" (not saying it is the case ^^) is just a terrible argument. We should forget him in this discussion; but again still my opinion?