Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-169.234.63.6-20130301024211/@comment-7034362-20130309042348

Aqua Mare wrote: I feel like that still means she could be from our world. She could still be a fairytale character, but orginated in our world. Why wouldn't they say "accent" along with it? Not trying to argue with you, but if that's they're process, that's stupid to me. Any way, If OUaT isn't doing Peter Pan (at least not now) I don't think they'd have a Wendy. They said they couldn't get the rights to it, I think that means characters, if you notice they never call Hook "Captain" Hook, and they changed his name and personality. I feel like they don't have the rights to use the characters how they are in the story. Also, I said it on another page too, Peter ends up together with Wendy's grandaughter, and though OUaT changes stories around, they stick to the objective of each story (see my post on "Other worlds being explored"). I could be wrong, but this seems like something they stick to, so.....

I'm sort of hoping this new character is Alice as Jefferson's wife (not as a little girl, that's plain creepy lol. It says she's young, but that doesn't have to mean little girl). Like before she met Jefferson. Actually, British could be either, but let's say there was a brilliant actress who had a great British Accent or a British girl who doesn't look right for the part? What matters is the accent. And isn't abc owned by Disney!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Disney made a Peter Pan movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is in fact probably how most people in the world have heard of it, like Mulan!!