Thread:Nightlily/@comment-5679696-20161103214217/@comment-91424-20161104004938

Are you referring to the act of replacing DVD screencaps and images from Internet sources, with Blu-ray quality images that is much higher quality? That is because Blu-ray is superior quality in every way. And no, we are not talking about "a few extra pixels". DVD images are definitely not "extremely good quality". If you compare DVD images to Blu-ray pics, DVD pics come out as horrible... The same thing can be said for most Internet sources. Even with HD iTunes images, Blu-ray images are far superior. The colors are much better, and the pictures are much clearer and bigger (I've previously spoken to Utter about this, and she too thinks Blu-ray screencaps are better.).

Killian, honestly. This is very unprofessional of you. It seems like the thoughts and feelings of the people who upload the images, are more important to you than the quality of the images. The focus should be on image quality, not the users who uploaded the pics. (The part about "discouraging", by the way, is pure speculation. We should not base our wiki on speculation.) It is the same as saying that we should not replace good contributions to articles with text that is even better written, since it may discourage people from editing. A lot of the info that I add, has been edited by others, but I would never dream of asking someone not to edit it, just because I wrote it. And some of the info that I've contributed, has been removed, but I would never ask people not to remove it, just because I was the one who added it.

It is in a wiki's very nature, that any contribution can, and will, be mercilessly edited and redistributed. Our images (especially the infobox images) and our articles should be the best quality there is. That is what is important, not the users' feelings.