Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24.193.18.17-20130513233057/@comment-7720627-20170209050701

yea bobbys contract w this show has been up for a while now. but the writers keep making rumple a idky but one minute hes a hero, next minute hes a villain, then back and forth until we all get confused, bc in the end he always ends up the bad guy, bc its rumple. also, now i think rumple's an anti-villain like how hook's a hero but in my eyes, he's still a anti-hero, if u get my drift. so w this show. bobby maynot come back for season7 thats if this season gets there come the finale, it cud b the last and final season come s7. anyway re: rumples undoing involving adultgideon/morpheus. i thought it was strange he was brainwashed and manipulated that badly that belle fell for it, if anything i think it wasnt morpheus who turned his own parents against one another, but rumples own mother. the seer wudv done what pan had done to him. hurt belfire, wudv killed him too, had no trouble by keeping him in the echo caves away from rumple. and then took back henry. even pan almost brainwashed henry into thinking he cud save magic, disre: the fact pan was going to kill him for his golden heart to give pan eternal youth, while henry laid there dead as a skunk. or even a tree log. so in re: w morpheus its alot different, and whole hella worse than what baelfire had to deal w, bc one pan mayhave raise baelfire, kept him from rumple, bc he knew his feud w hook was over bae's mother, who left him for that deal rumple made to save vaes life the same day milah met hook and for a split second she forgot baelfire, her own son was dying from a snake bite. belle is like milah 2.0, tho i still think shes eaisily manipulated, easily judgemental, doesnt let rumple finish a sentence where it wasnt his fault she gave birth early bc it was TEQ and not him. the differences i cud give b/w neal&morpheus wud b it wud give me a bad headaache. but at the end of this thing. henry's still the key. and i havent figured it out yet. somehow his life is linked to rumple's not that im saying henry cud write rumple a happy endingw belle&gideon even tho he cudnt give it to himself by resurrecting neal. but since neal has moved on. whats stopping henry from bringing his dad back, the apprentice did lie, and still henry chooses not to, bc its the right thing, yet his mirror self wishes he had known neal. but in all honesty, tbh this whole propjecy is obsurd. it doesnt make sense anymore. one bc its henry and two; bc its rumple. and usually things w rumple dont end well, things w henry r fine in their own right, but also end up in bad shape too. so to end this convo. i do think it still applies to gideon as well, and not just baelfire, bc unless the seer meant one of them and not both. bc henry reunited neal w rumple n 2x14, rumbelle will b reunited w gideon somehow in the most dysfunctional way. im actually afriad of what rumples mom can do, let alone shed make what pan did to emma look like childs play. pan had no problems w killing emmas parents, but grandmastiltskin wants to kill emma bc she thinx she can. ok now im done. apologies im ranting again :/