Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20171014203438/@comment-6302057-20171016103923

Killian Jones wrote: SeanWheeler wrote: Why not use redirects? They would work the same way. Because then we have to decide what to name the actual page and which names will be just redirects, and it has become abundantly clear that there is no general consensus as to what name we should use. Sure, we could keep voting and eventually an option will get more votes than the others, but the number of people who will be unhappy is significantly large. This way no name is more important than the other. In this case, once could argue we are still technically selecting which identity will be the anchor (original counterpart) and which will be the redirect equivalent (all others).

While an inventive solution, I personally hold concerns that it may make editing confusing for less-experienced users, and it does seem a bit senseless to have two pages with identical content, regardless of them not being duplicates in the coding sense.

I'm on the fence.