Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5679696-20130311021240/@comment-1916997-20150402033257

Utter solitude wrote: If I'm outvoted, I'm outvoted, but I stand my opinion and suggestions and the fact that it was already discussed, at least this particular case. I'm never a fan of "well this article has this so this one should too!", so if need be, we should examine other articles that this applies to. I'm not at all saying we shouldn't note allusions, but an allusion isn't the same as being directly drawn from a character in a previous work, and that difference should be noted. Imo, it should be in trivia, or the word "allusion" should be use in intros where it applies.

Or not. Just my opinion XD I'm good with using allusion in the intro for characters that are less concrete. Honestly, I thought that was what we have already been doing anyway. And I don't think anyone was getting heated Edward, we we're just debating which is what a community based encylopedia needs to do, as their is not only one "head". It's like our own little Hydra (shout out to another show on ABC, I'm sure some of you will get it).