Board Thread:Show-Related Questions and Answers/@comment-27308670-20160307235212/@comment-25926288-20160412151028

CoyoteDork wrote:

Avatar Beta wrote: Speaking as an avid reader, I personally wouldn't enjoy a book like "Heroes and Villains." Some of Issac's ideas were dumb, like switching Regina and Snow so completely right down to their ages. Why? And why does Snow need magic? I mean, how would people see that as a revamped Snow White when it hardly resembles the character the people of LWM know? Basically, I think the Au was a good idea done badly by Issac{really A+e.} Okay, off-topic rant over. Isaac's book was so dumb and made no sense, it was supposed to be about how the villains get happy endings and the heroes lose...but he just made Snow and co the villains, while Rumple (and for some reason Regina) were the heroes. It should have been Rumple and the villains in power while Snow loses I'll agree. You can't really have much of a twist as they claimed because Snow White was the Evi Q-Actually, does Once exist in the LWM? Because then none of those people would know how Rumplestilskin story is different because Rumple doesn't go with Belle in any fairytale and if he's the beast, then how does that differ from any BatB. Noone would know who Zelena was besides some Maid Marian stand-in. Robin Hood was the same. Fairies and dwarves did what those beings do. So, I'd say Isaac's book would be good, but definitely not best seller. So, I'm sure he somehow used magic to manipulate the LWM.