Board Thread:Off-Topic Fun/@comment-2153169-20180115021638/@comment-31937823-20180211000415

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Actually, I'm like you Tail High on this one.

@CDA, can I know where you get to decide that we have to "Reset by dividing in half"? I can get that we can reduce the number when the last elements have both a loooot of points so it'd take longer to take all points, but that's certainly not something automatic OR something to do when the difference is THAT big.

I'm pretty sure someone did that in the last round, and no one complained. It keeps the point spread between the remaining things intact, while still allowing people to play. It wouldn't really be fair to put Emile and Bex both back at 30, when Bex had so many more votes for her. If we don't want to divide in half, then I say we have to get rid of the max.

So, because someone did it already, it is okay to do it systematically? Plus, in that case, you could have just asked, not like I'm always absent and not responding... Guess, it is better to do it like that, right?

Also, from what I checked... S17, TheRose did it because you suggested it, or suggested to get rid of the max limit. S16, you did it. S14, you did it. So please, don't try to put this on someone else. That's not cool.

Why are you saying it would not be fair to put them back to 30? Where did I say we should do that? And no, we're not getting rid of the max.

Now, it is too late, cos people already started using that account. But yeah, if you could stop making rules from now on, that would be cool.

Reducing by half in this case is just huge, especially because it would not reflect the votes and the difference of the situation. 1/3 would have been quite enough, and more fair.

I’m sorry that I did it the last time, I had assumed that was apart of the rules or something.