Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-25926288-20170805235523/@comment-2153169-20170806165857

Aine1989 wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Aine1989 wrote: Really? Because everything I wrote in my mini-essay comes from actual canon. No, from your personnal and one-sided reading of the canon. Not the same ;)

BTW, I thought bashing and hating was not allowed anymore on all forums, except the rant and rave? :) Tthen by your own logic, you bashing Killian should not be allowed on this thread either. Especially since you resort to making stuff up about him.

All the evidence I took actually happened in the show.

And that's the biggest problem I keep pointing out. When we say anything about how bad Hook can be, your basic reaction is "Yeah, but Regina is worse!!!!" You expect us to have a real discussion with you when you're being on-sided all along? Saying that Hook can be bad is not "bashing", it is pointing out some points. Something that we can all do. Going all hard against Regina because some people said something about Hook is bashing.

And that's what you're doing. And no matter you said, you keep proving it, over and over.

Basically, because we say how bad Hook can be, you can bash and hate Regina all you want? That's not how a constructive discussion is meant to happen. And no one is making stuff here; don't call us liars cos you don't see some evidences about Hook.

Plus, "A question was asked about why people view characters differently, I answered with my own experiences" -> your own experience? As for now, all we read is that you laugh at the idea of Regina's redemption and that, for you, fans who think Rumple and Regina changed since S2 are blinded. I don't call that "answered with your own experience", I call that "underestimate the opinion of a big part of the fandom" like they were wrong but can't see it. Sounds a bit... harsh to me? And a not so called "opinion". But hey, I'm the one who "threw a hissy fit" ;)