Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-6175354-20151022010211/@comment-1916997-20151211174626

Frulna wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Frulna wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Frulna wrote: I don't take what they say in press release as cannon, if it doesn't happen on the show it doesn't count, they have time to change their minds until then. Nope, that's not how this works. The names given in a press release are the names the writers gave them in the script, regardless of whether or not the name is said in the actual episode. And since the writers determine the canon, what they name the character in the script is canon as well. we will have to agree to diagree You can disagree all you want, doesn't mean your not wrong. His name being Brennan is a fact, not an opinion. Like I have said many times there is no point in arguing this anymore, you can believe whatever you would like to That's the problem here, you are making this about belief. This isn't "is God real?" where there are two sides, and no way to prove or disprove either side. This is "1+1=2", and your saying "I think it equals 4". Now, just as someone can belief 1+1=4, you can belief Brennan's name is Davy or Rich or Jose, but those are all incorrect, and not admitting we are right, and that the name is in fact confirmed to be Brennan is just as bad as denying something that is clearly presented to you in the show. Like what if we said "Cora is not the Queen of Hearts", you would disagree, and say that the show clearly shows she is. This is the same thing, the showrunners have decided the name of Hook's father, and it is Brennan. It may not be said in the episode, but that is what it is. If he appears in a later episode, and someone says his name, it will be Brennan, because that is what is already decided on. So feel free to believe whatever you want, but know that what you believe is factually incorrect, and that all that belief you have will not change the outcome of Hook's father's name being Brennan.