Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-4975807-20150427164031/@comment-25926288-20150429034346

CoolDudeAl wrote: Eskaver wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Utter solitude wrote: The consensus is already forming on a simpler rule. "Do they have a new identity?" Is a good litmus test with no or few exceptions. Frankly, all or nothing doesnt really work, there will always be exceptions.

The way pages are handled when they went back to the EF was decided at the time, everything reverted to their EF page, as the script called them by their former names. Hook only has one page, and Neal was an exception as he was an adult and still referred to as Neal. The problem with this is we have seen aspects of the new identity. Eric being a fisherman is from his cursed identity, as is Bo Peep being a butcher. Also, it's implied everyone in the first curse was given a false name, etc., we just haven't heard it because we never had a need to. My suggestion is that if we know they were a victim of the first curse, they should still have a split page. I'm fine with characters we know weren't part of the first curse being put all on one page though (so Robin, Aurora, etc.). They shouldn't have a split page. What would you put on a page if you have a sentence of information? Eric was cursed to be a fisherman. The End. Um, what else? Johanna was cursed in some way we don't know. Post curse, she met up with Snow and later died at the hands of Cora. What an insightful page! Whether you put post-curse stuff on the cursed page or the EF page, one of them would be lacking! Yes, I got that, I'm just saying the rule isn't really "do they have a new identity" then. It's "do they have a new identity and enough info to make a seperate page". I will agree. Do they have a new identity that we see? Do we have enough information?