Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-1916997-20170910030941/@comment-25926288-20170912021030

ChocolatEyes613 wrote: Eskaver wrote: Speculation. A princess turned villain is better (imo) than some weird replacing and inserting thingy. No offence, but that is not even an original idea. Carolyn Turgeon already twisted the story, by having Rapunzel become Snow White's stepmother. Fairytale character might be public domain, but that book's plot is copyrighted.

Considering how popular the Tangled animated series is, it is unlikely Disney would even allow that type of twist. Whether fans like it or not, the Disney inserts are probably the only thing, keeping ABC from cancelling OUaT. Tell that to the Hispanic Cinderella (which I love). Snow White had a one night stand and practically condoned adultery to a woman whose mother she actively tried to kill. Belle was in a (near) abusive relationship with a lying, controllin, threatening babysnatching mass murderer. Peter Pan was a murderous selfish brat. Even Elsa's parents had great disdain for Elsa's affliction and went to Rumplestilskin to rid her off it, meanwhile Elsa's Aunt killed the other and then commited suicide. Arthur, the valiant knight, brutally murdered Fergus in front of Merida, while her clansmen also nearly exectured her triplet brothers.

Oh and Snow's a murder. Belle's a murder. Aurora attempted murder. Mulan's unhappy and alone. Cinderella nearly attempted murder and was brutally stabbed. Merida was planning murder. Even Alice was ready to kill those who stood in her way and I do think she definitely killed some of those guards. So, somehow Disney allows all of this (even a different version of Rapunzel in season 3), but they'll restrict Adam and Eddy because..........