Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3440938-20180415183306/@comment-1826156-20180419062236

Peter Pan was always shady, even the Disney version, to an extent. He was originally a vilalin of sorts in the original manuscript for Peter Pan and Wendy. But of course he's always portrayed as a hero.

The Miller's Daughter (Cora) wasn't exactly a good character, she was neutral, though an abused character, it wouldn't be hard to see her becoming vindictive.

Arthur was definitely a big change, he often did some jerk things in his stories but they were always made out to be noble and heroic and he was never right out evil. Once's Arthur is hard to say, I'd call him wicked, but one could argue he thinks he's doing things for the greater good. He certainly counts as an alignment swap, though.

However, Blue and Tink are not of a different alignment. In the original stories, Tinker Bell wasn't exactly a good character, but she wasn't evil, either. She was malicious and murderous, though, which Barry explains as being so small she could only ever be bad or good and nothing in between. Maybe she was chaotic good? Blue is good, being a jerk and enforcing rules doesn't make one evil. She has never even really been an antagonist. She truly wanted what was best for Tink and Nova, kind of like an overprotective mother. But Tink refused to follow the rules and even though she had good intentions, it was clear that Blue was right, she wasn't mature enough to deal with making the decisions she did.

Anastasia (season 7) was a swap, she never seemed to harbor any of the cruel nature that her Disney or fairy tale counterpart did.

Rapunzel was definitely a swap.

The Wizard of Oz is kind of hard to judge, he was very much out for himself in both the books and Once. While I don't know if the book Wizard would go after Emma,  he was manipulative and gave Princess Ozma to Mombi. He later becomes a hero, but he was definitely not a hero in his first appearances.