Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-1916997-20160117070033/@comment-1916997-20160402053130

Farerb wrote: I am only writing this and I am dropping it because''' I do not appreciate people putting words in my mouth. '''if people want to decide whether something is mature or not based on its demographic or the age group it's aimed for, that's fine. All I can suggest is looking at the content rather than that. I'm sure there are people who would agree that most of Disney films are something that most adults can enjoy even though they are mostly aimed for younger people.

However, here is the beautiful thing, it's all subjective. Like I said, everyone can choose the criteria that they want to apply in order to decide what is for adults and what is for kids. The reason I see Buffy as more mature than OUAT even though they are aimed for the same age group. Buffy used its fantasy and supernatural elements as metaphor for real life situation, the characters delt with real conflicts, showed real emotions and had a realistic reaction to the things that going around them (and that is something we used to see on OUAT season 1). Like I said, this is how I SEE IT. If for other people, chasing after a mushroom that has no effect or relevance on plot or character development, or better I'll conect that to the upcoming episode, a really badly animated huge Caricature that acts like the fairies from 'Maleficent',  are considered Mature and something that make us grown ups think and analyse, then so be it. I'm not the one to decide for you, only for myself.

This might be said on a different show, but it is applied in here as well:

https://twitter.com/ShameofScones/status/690386203007422464 No one was putting words into your mouth, but okay. And yes, everything is subjective, so you shouldn't state things like they are facts, when they are not. That's the difference: saying what the target market of a show is is a fact; saying what you personally feel the show is targeted towards based on how you inturpet the content is an opinion.