Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4775130-20150611162216/@comment-6175354-20150612160654

Hmcooper4 wrote: While you're absolutely right about the connection with contract, I really wish they would stop and consider the character before offering the contract. If the character is going to serve little purpose in the storyline, they probably should not be on contract. and if the actor is on contract, they need to do a better job of finding way that the character can meaningfully interact with the other characers and move the storyline. Michael never really did that in any of his appearances on the main show (and I liked his character from Wonderland). Not his fault, I blame the writers for that one. I do not blame the writers.... I blame the network for wasting money, on these useless contracts. These random "starring" cast members, seem to be a running gag on ''OUaT. ''