Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-24674051-20150720164321/@comment-25926288-20151001184001

CTrent29 wrote: Emma should not be the Savior anymore. She should have ceased to be the Savior after breaking the first curse. To continue calling her "the Savior" lacks logic on the show runners' part.

The real question is why did King Arthur look for Excalibur when he was already king.

He was already king when he pulled out the bottom half of Excalibur? I do know that Arthur's father was also king. I think the Savior title Rumple used to break the curse, but Emma was meant to save the world from Darkness, since anyone can break the DC unless specified. It's totally logical. The only illogical part is trying to "give everyone their happy ending".

I guess we'll have to wait and see how his backstory goes.