Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4453062-20160217065238/@comment-24674051-20160419173428

Eskaver wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Hmcooper4 wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: So anyone have any new theories about this episode now that we are furthur in the season? Can we not have any more posts like this. They are getting redundant. And they don't add any value to the conversation. Sorry, just trying to not get these threads totally lost in the suffle because we will need them soon. Plus, that was from last week, I added a thought to my post this week. I think it's okay CDA, just try to change it up a little with your postulating and theories and no "So, what's new in the neighborhood?" kind of questions. Only because they pop up every so often. It;s the equivalent of bumping a thread and not much more than that.

A bump and a theory is slightly better, but I guess Hm will have to explain since I don't see much wrong (besides doing it in about every thread, lol). I agree that the Bump/Theory would be much better. I know that you're just keeping the threads in the forefront, just bump it with your thoughts on what might happen, or what might have changed based on new information. That is much more interesting. (and you usually have pretty good thoughts, anyway).

Now to get back on topic, as to the villains, there don't look to be any additional appearances by any villains after this except for Hades. So either they will all resolve their fates by this point, or some of them may be relegated to spending additional time in the UW. I think Sisters will resolve James and Cora, and possibly Pan as well. That would leave us with the Blind Witch and Cruella. and I think that Cruella's conversation with Henry in the Mayor's office (in Labor of Love) was probably a bit of foreshadowing towards her eventual end.