Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-2153169-20170909025746/@comment-1916997-20170911204855

TheRose123 wrote:

Adam.armstrong.33 wrote:

Chameleon-Guy wrote: DatNuttyKid wrote: Adam.armstrong.33 wrote: Honestly I don't want this Lady Tremaine/Rapunzel theory to be true, because my vision of Rapunzel 2.0 is good, plucky, fearless and adventurous and my vision of Lady Tremaine 2.0 is notorious, formidable, calculating but still relatable. The casting announcement says that Rapunzel 2.0 will try to get revenge on her kidnapper. That's already a good indication of her not being (at least entirely) "good". I'm glad we have more grey characters, with dubious morality. And, even though it may not be my faovirte theory, the fact that she wants revenge... yes, reinforces the idea that she may become villanous and be Lady Tremaine. Yes but as someone previously said, having them being two separate characters will expand the world of the new Enchanted Forest, and that's personally what I would like to happen. In a way, it would. Following the tale of Rapunzel, she would've been stolen from a king and a queen, so either way there would be three kingdoms. (The one in the story of Cinderella, the one they are including with Tiana, and this one)

If you are talking about adding more fairy-tale characters to this new realm, their would still be more characters, except that Lady Tremaine and Rapunzel would be the same person in two stories. It would also be clever because it would allow for the stories to mix together better. Going to use the Disney names to make it easier for everyone, although they wouldn't nessisarily have these names on Once. Rapunzel would marry Flynn Rider (his real name would be Lord Tremaine), and have Drizella and Anastasia with him (which reflects that Rapunzel has two children in the traditional story), but something happens and Flynn dies, leaving Rapunzel a widow. Angry and bitter, she eventually remarries Cinderella's father. It actually fits together pretty great.