Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4877635-20160624153325/@comment-2153169-20160624163306

NickyHelp wrote:

Lady Junky wrote:

NickyHelp wrote:

Lady Junky wrote:

Rwo wrote: I'd keep in mind that it might be only casting call names for Aladdin and Jasmine. Who's thought about that possibility? ...

Guys, they already adapted Aladdin with OUATIW. Even if they don't appear, the story was already adapted.

Plus, why in the world they'd gave REAL characters names as casting call names? And the article is quite clear, they're doing Sinbad and Scheherazade. No implication of these names being a possible red-herring.

Why it would be wrong for them to do Sinbad and Scheherazade? << Especially when people keep CONTINOUSLY to criticize the fact they are too Disney-ish. Except Aladdin and Jasmine never showed up. Only Jafar. And since when they need to give the EXACT name to adapt a story? Look at Rumple.

And if they did Aladdin and Jasmine, people would AGAIN complain that they're just adapting Disney films and not real stories. Now that they're not doing a Disney, there is a problem cos they are not Aladdin and Jasmine? x_x

So yeah, personally, I'm at the point to think that whatever they'll do, some people will just never be happy with the show again ^^ Whatever they're doing. And I do think it is kinda sad x.x

So yeah, to come back to the topic, I'm super happy about Scheherazade. She could be a great addition :) And I'm like super curious about Sinbad :D Guess we'll have to wait and see till then. After all they did q similar thing with Merida, Zeus, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. And Speaking of Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll, shouldn't you change the groundsman and Warden to their real names in the season 6 page and other pages now that we already know who they really are? Not really the place for it, but as our policies say, we're waiting a press release to call them Jekyll and Hyde before renaming it :)