Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1894786-20151107225625/@comment-1916997-20151108190356

Lady Junky wrote: Arctucrus wrote: All the more reason not to force one person's interpretation of what could obviously be several different interpretations on everyone else, and just leave a simple, blanket statement. That's exactly the problem of your statements. If we put what you and CDA suggested, we will say that all elements from Frozen happened, but are changed. Clearly, some events prolly/could not happened. Olaf is not canon in OUAT, and the Duke could definitely not be a part of Elsa's story. By adding your statement, we would say that he is a part of Elsa's story, which is not true.

Better to check all mentioned elements. Well, according to Adam and Eddy all the events are same as seen in the movie, so it wouldn't be untrue. What your suggesting will turn into a huge problem, with people arguing over ever little line and what it means. And it would still leave out things that have to had happened, for anything to even make sense.