Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25926288-20170504224453/@comment-31931060-20170506054923

Eskaver wrote: Not to discredit your argument, but I don't think you fully read what I wrote as you argue somethings that are not discussed here. I'll break your response with my rebuttal down below:

1. Fallacy. Nothing I say is for or against that.

2. We never saw the Apprentice use magic in ye olden days of Rumple, Fiona, or before.

3. Irrelevant as this is about dark magic. If anything, I said light magic became more accessible when Blue was born, so this statement doesn't counter that.

4. Most of those aren't proven in the show. Secondly, again, none of what you say is in opposition to my theory.

5a. As said in my theory that light and dark magic have always existed. It's like the first theory, lol.

5b. We haven't seen any human practioner of Dark Magic that predates Fiona's change. Name one that has shown magic that doesn't derive their magic from the Holy Grail. Key word: Dark Magic.

6. Completely irrelevant as I didn't even dicsuss that theory as I briefly mentioned it for a possible different thread. The Appprentice's wand needs dark magic for using and has been existing for 300 years in the moment of Fiona's transformation. Apprentice was a human. So, when Merlin made this wand, the human dark magic had already existed, and it was long before Fiona