Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9232373-20140310170508/@comment-11464223-20140312223055

Stonicus wrote: Arctucrus wrote: Stonicus wrote: Arctucrus wrote:...Because MM/Snow is suddenly many months on to a pregnancy? So they know something's missing? And they can have checked the internet for the date, and see that it's been a year? That would just tell them a year had passed, not whether they had actually returned to the EF... if in their mind they had just been saying goodbye to Emma, then they're back in their little apartment, "we went to the EF and a new curse sent us back" is much more of a stretch than "the return home didn't work"... Naht really, the idea that they went back to the EF in that missing year is the most logical conclusion... We'll just have to agree to disagree... if I fall asleep in the car while it's still in the driveway, and wake up a few hours later, still in the driveway, it's not logical (to me anyway) that I travelled anywhere at all...

If you're going to try and make me look stupid, do it right.

If you fall asleep in the car while it's still in the driveway, but after setting the car to an "autopilot mode" where it'll take you somewhere while you're asleep and no one in sight to turn the autopilot mode off, then wake up what feels like a few moments later many months into a pregnancy with the autopilot mode off, not to mention the date being a year after when you fell asleep, you're going to assume that a year went by that your memory's not aware of, and seeing as everything pointed to you being on your way to that place and there was nothing there to stop you when you left, the thought process with the least assumptions is that you went there during that year and something brought you back.