Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1916997-20180221223336/@comment-1916997-20180222132145

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Well, we should have it one way or the other. Right now (if I'm remembering correctly) we have Phillip's horse and Belle's horse, for example, and if we have those we should have all the horses. Or we just list none of them. It shouldn't be half and half. That's completely different. Phillip's horse and Belle's horse are named characters from the films. So, they're minor characters from the film. They're not just "all animal", they're more than that. Yes, but those are later movies. In Snow White, the Queen, the Prince, and the Huntsman don't even have a name, but it doesn't mean they aren't significant. And it isn't like it is that hard to reference we say The Prince's Horse alludes to Charming's horse. Lola has really good reasoning for the birds above, so I'll let you read what she said in regards to those.