Thread:Lady Junky/@comment-26967699-20170627002156/@comment-2153169-20170627011419

CadoDoan wrote: It should have been you who started it, not me.

You're saying you're fallowing what it's saying. What it's saying is: "...is not limited to the mere mix of ingredients. That would be potioncraft." But now, you're changing it an entirelly different thing: "...is not limited to the mere mixing of ingredients. Most of these cases are potioncraft, although other such spells may exist."

As I said, I won't let a user do what they think is right, and they can get away with this.

Again? You're accusing me of something I did not do. Again, not the first time. Guess that's your way of accusation, right? DatNuttyKid changed it, not me. But hey, guess that's easier to accuse me without even checking, right?

And by all accounts, he just made the rule clearer. The second part is meant to be the example. Like for the others ones. The real rule is there: "...is not limited to the mere mixing of ingredients." Clearly. Very clear, I'd say. So yes, I'm following what it is saying.