Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-35205453-20181202053317/@comment-26967699-20181203075938

Schroeswald wrote: Matheus1234zx wrote: IMO, a character that was credited as guest star should have a page, no matter how minor his role was I really want to think that, I really do, that’s why I added all of them to my list, but really I can’t see any justification for the Captain (Swan Song) and Dr. Thatcher, and I had to rip myself away from the Jailer but there isn’t much that would belong on his page(the rest I am trying to create).

CadoDoan wrote: I disagree.

If we needed a guide for creating a page for a character, we would have it a long time ago.

We don’t need a rule or a guide for this. We only have to ask ourselves one question: What difference would it make if this character is not in the List of Minor Characters page?. So basically speaking, this includes their history section, appearance box and trivial information. The best example for this is Gordie for example (as much as I know in the wiki). Oh come on Cado, will having a guide hurt anything? Having a page for things that will be frequently looked up is helpful for navigation, yes there might not be much more information but having a page makes finding stuff easier, the Appearances look better, you have all the vital information in an infobox and when you search for it you don’t have to find it on the List page. Deciding on a case by case basis will still be going on but it just makes it easier to cite reasons, instead of explaining why they don’t deserve a page you can just say, it only fits 1 and 4 so no page. Because the way I see it, you're just trying to give a page for even very minor characters because you feel that way. Don't get me wrong, I know it's your personal opinion. But a page with a short history and nothing else will look empty and look very bad. Like there's something missing about the character, but it's also not, due to the character being so so minor. That's what I'm talking about.