Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4877635-20160722094328/@comment-25926288-20160812182814

ItachiIshtar wrote: Eskaver wrote: Or Ana's not related to Ella. Betting their cousins XD

IT's also not fair to say that the writers don't keep track of their timeline. I think they do a decent job, just they don't understand the concept of time and they squeeze things in weird places. XD It would be weird to go back on what they so heavily implied on Wonderland. Her name is Anastasia (the same name as one of the step-sisters in the Disney film), and they said that the prince chose her step-sister instead of her. Not to mention out of all the characters to randomly make a cameo in Wonderland's first episode, they chose to have Ashley appear. I just find it hard to believe that those were all coincidences. I mean I guess they could chose to not go through with that idea, for a variety of reasons. That route would be a huge disappointment and a missed opportunity, to be quite honest. But that's the show's name: Lost Potential. XD

Chances are about 20% of fans and viewers have seen or know of Wonderland. Ana could stay implied, but I don't think she'd be relvant in this episode. I mean, it's even the case that we all spend more time talking about Ana than Ella herself.

Timeline says Ana can't be Ella's stepsister unless there are four to five sisters, which could be, or not. Although, I would say that they are awfully British and live in the Awfully British Sherwood Forest, yet.....actually, that may not be important.

I'm placing my trust that they'll make the best decision regarding this dilemma.