Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20171014023101/@comment-2153169-20171014201447

Nightlily wrote: Well, there definitely seems to be a strong majority for the merging, and while the discussion isn't over yet, I think we know now that the merging will most likely happen.

As for the names of the merged articles, I think it could be a good idea to have a separate discussion for that, where we present the three options (original credited name vs. credited cursed name in SB vs. credited cursed name in Seattle - remember that we only use the credited name), and then people can pick the one they prefer. We should also highlight it, of course, to, ahem, draw in (*wink*) as many users as possible. Personally, I think that would be the easiest way to settle it.

Why redoing a separate discussion while the biggest majority agree with something already?