Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-6175354-20170720184833/@comment-32569754-20170728013317

Lady Junky wrote: ChocolatEyes613 wrote: Can we agree that there are three possibilities, as to why Emma Swan would no longer be the Savior?

- She died, as was foretold

- She severed her fate

- She lost her magic, when Gideon stabbed her

Another possibility: Emma is the Savior of Book 1, and Henry is the Savior of Book 2. I really hope this is not the case. In my honest opinion an Author should not be able to be a savior, and vice versa. If Henry is an Author AND a Savior then he would be so overpowered the universe would implode. He would be able to completely erase any opponent with a mere thought. No. Henry has to be either an Author or a Savoir. He, (nobody for that matter), should be allowed to be both.

I feel the same way with the whole "Dark Swan" mess in season 5. A single person should not be able to be the Savior AND the Dark One. They really screwed that up in season 5. Either Emma's Savior status should have protected her from being possessed by the Dark One, or she should have been stripped of her Savior status the moment she became the Dark One, and a new Savoir should have been chosen. They totally screwed the pooch on that whole Dark Swan idea back in season 5. (Not to mention that Jennifer Morrison just does not have the acting chops to play a villian. Her entire Dark Swan performance was just painful to watch.) Let's not have a repeat of anything like that again, thank you very much.

I also feel like making Henry (or even his daughter) be the new Savior is the predictable (and lazy) thing to do. I'd actually be much more intrigued if the new Savoir turns out to be soemone other than Henry or his daughter.