Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-1916997-20150924001026/@comment-26159109-20150924065833

Lady Junky wrote: First of all, the canonicity of the book is not the topic of this thread. It is about The Fox and The Hound Characters in the book. Second, i'm sorry to tell you that Farerb, but your whole argument is wrong. The author of Red's Untold Tale did NOT write Reawakened. No need to make a whole point on something if it is not true.

But, I think we're thinking about it the wrong way. I show this article to an admin, before adding it on the page and asking if we can use it as source. I'm not idiot. And yes, if I added it; it means I got a yes. So, to me, I think at this point we need a proof that it is not canon, because that's the point that you're trying to make. We have our source for canon, it was approved. So, I think if you want to make a point on what you're saying, well you should try to find another souce which correct the one we have. That's the difference: we're not trying to prove that it is canon, that's a discussion about the book possibly being not canon; that's the proof we should have. I admit that I have mistaken about the author, but it still not matter. The source on the page just suggest that, but it does not say that. The word canon is not even in the article. If you think that's enough for the book to be considered canon, then I'm sorry, but you have no idea what canon is. Buffy and charmed have a lot of tie in books that are not considered canon. The only ones that can consider it canon are the show creators. You can't assume that something is canon just because the autor of the book says so (which even she hasn't said the book is canon btw). You say it's canon because Adam and Eddy didn't deny it- well that is not how it works.