Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1916997-20150909055603/@comment-25926288-20151220190138

CoolDudeAl wrote: Eskaver wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Eskaver wrote: Yes, because Daf(obscured) is a delightful name XD

Unknown is better since the entire name is Unknown to us. The name is not unknown to us, it is partially known. It's probably Daphne spelled differently. But we can't confirm it. Also, it is confirmed she's a Queen, which Unknown does not tell us. Married to a King, I think it sort of goes with implication.

Probably is not a definitive word so it's meaningless. I could argue it's Daffy Duck or Daffodil Or Dafou and I'd have as much right as you. Unknown is the best alternative. Unknown implies nothing is known about this person. They are known to be Queen Daf(something). If I'm talking about you, is it more helpful and accurate to say "He's a mod who's name starts with an E", or to say "He's unknown". Clearly the former. Same should apply here. That's probably trivia-worthy, not a fact. I mean we can change unknown to Obscured or something. I understand what you are saying but besides how it's not really important and will never be re-encountered. there is an agrument for that obscuring, but even in history if half a name is obscured, they probably aren't going to put Daf(obscured), but rather unknown Queen, likely (insert random Queen related).