Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-6175354-20161010033114/@comment-26443838-20161117182338

Farerb wrote: NickyHelp wrote: Farerb wrote: DatNuttyKid wrote: Farerb wrote:

DatNuttyKid wrote:

Farerb wrote: I don't want it to be Hook. He doesn't need more terrible secrets from his past only to be forgotten and swept under the rug. You mean like how Hook leaving Liam an orphan was never brought up again? Or more like how Regina murdered Graham with no repercussions? Just curious what backstories you find inappropriately done and which ones are perfectly fine. So do you take me for a Regina apologist? No, both of them did terrible thing, both of them are terrible people, whose relationships with the herocrites don't make sense. I'm still waiting for them to go to an anbiased policemen and confess their crimes like murdering people and actually pay for them if they feel so bad about it. Retribution is still a part of redemption and they didn't do it so they are not redeemed. I guess that's the difference between you and me. I think that redemption is only a matter of forgiveness. I don't see the reason to go through a million punishments if they already have admitted their crimes and shown signs of not committing them again, it seems like unnecessary torture for someone who already has to deal with the emotional strain of what they did.

And I'm sure Graham and Merlin understand it, oh wait, they can't cause their dead.

Please watch Angel. And murdered by cold blood. I didn't see any forgiveness for Hook and Regina for that. Probably not yet. And after all, A&E informed that if ever that Emma finds out that Regina murdered Graham, she would take the issue with it.

It's not going to happen. The writers aren't going to acknowledge Regina killing Graham or Hook doing anything wrong because it conflicts with Emma supposedly being about Justice, well she's not anymore but they don't want to address it, especially not directly, because they are bad writers who have no idea of the concept of justice and redemption. Emma doesn't seek justice regarding them and they are "redeemed" because like DNK says they say they are heroes now and that's what matters or whatever, which is nonesense. You say The writers aren't going to acknowledge Regina killing Graham or Hook doing anything wrong because it conflicts with Emma supposedly being about Justice, but you don't know that at all. After all, she did do plenty of that on Rumple need I remind you. It's nonsense when you talk like you know something when in reality you never do when nothing happened yet. Maybe they might achknowledge Graham's death and maybe not. But no one knows yet or at all. What you are just opinions, not official facts.

You forget? There hasn't been any foregiveness from Henry to Emma after she did to him and Violet. Not even from Regina.

Henry said he forgave Rumple because he said he changed like Regina. But what happens later? It reverts.

Also, Merida didn't show any forgiveness to Emma after everything she did to her.

Also, there hasn't been forgiveness for Rumple by Charming after what he got Snow to do (which was really his fault and crime). Emma knows that as well (during when trying to find a way to save her father and return from Neverland alive).

Also, Charming did show a little grudge on Regina for when she revealed that she sent Edmund to kill them before she apologized and plans to fix it.

Why in the Underworld when Regina reasons with her not to give up, even though Snow had already forgiven Regina, she was being critical on her for what she did to her by casting her curs, taking her kingdom and how she lost Emma for 28 years because of Regina.

Ariel certainly showed that on Hook briefly by punching him in the face for breaking his half of the bargain on finding Eric.