Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25926288-20160502010041/@comment-27885419-20160506160615

Eskaver wrote: PrettyBlackRosePirate wrote: Eskaver wrote: The problem with the test isEmma would have saved anyone regardless of who was put on flames from their group.

Imagine if it was Henry, her parents, Regina, and even Belle. She'd save them all, so that test was more of a test of greed/ambition than TRUE love. Not exactly. It's easy to say that she'll do that for anyone, but you're in pain nd are given a choice to either save yourself or save the dead man you want to bring back to life, it's basically testing your determination to bring that person back. It's basically 'would you die so he can come back to life' kinda choice.

I think it was just an innovative way of officially confirming them as true love (coz if Zades or KansasWolfie are declared true love, then CaptainSwan bloody well are) instead of going for the usual kiss. I'm all for an innovative way, but the test isn't strong enough. Emma would save whomever was sititing there on fire, like Belle. The writers love innovation, but it doesn't always make the best sense. I can agree on that... But again when has there been a logical true love test?