Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-24718835-20141112013800/@comment-1894786-20141120224319

Anubis16 wrote: Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: Anubis16 wrote: Nakis91 wrote: Mirkoooo wrote: I never liked that they added Frankenstein and I hate that they're adding Cruella. Are we now going to get a hundred dogs on OUAT, too? Well Pongo is there.

Also, even if I agree with Fankenstein, why don't you like Cruella? Its a classic Disney character. I think this guy thinks that the show should be mroe fouced on fairy tales and not Disney Considering we have things that aren't Disney but aren't fairytales either (Lancelot, Excalibur, etc.) neither one has complete control over the show. True, and I just realized Frankenstein was never a Disney movie either, but do you think 101 Dalmations is classic enough for the show, I don't want them to adapt it just because it's owned by Disney, but I do love the idea of Cruella on the show especially with her teaming up with Ursula and Maleficent Well, I definitely think that Disney owning 101 Dalmatians makes it more easily accessible to A&E. But it seems like their focus is iconic literature. And coincidentally Disney owns like 80% of iconic literature. (Remember how Graham was originally meant to be Sherlock Holmes? Disney doesn't own Sherlock, and he's not a fairy tale character either.) Cruella is most definitely iconic, thanks to Disney. But since her story is 101 Dalmatians, they have to adapt it to some extent.