Board Thread:Show-Related Questions and Answers/@comment-1104079-20130224235036/@comment-7295428-20130320110232

ChocolatEyes613 wrote: Orhan94 wrote: First, we have the ones they've introduced some characters from, but more are still yet to appear - "Alice in Wonderland" (Alice, the Cheshire Cat, the White Rabbit), "Aladdin" (Aladdin, Jasmine and Jafar), "Peter Pan" (Peter Pan, Tinkerbell, the Darlings, the Lost Boys and Tiger Lily) and the Arthurian legend (King Arthur, Guinevere, Merlin) - and we have the stories which have been set up - "The Wizard of Oz" and "The Little Mermaid". OUaT may have established that OZ exists in their universe, but at the end of the day it all comes down to licenses and budget.

Disney has probably prohibited OUaT from touching the OZ franchise, due to the new movie. Same thing can be said for the Aladdin franchise, as Disney is adapting the film for Broadway. There is also Giancarlo Esposito's schedule to consider, as his Genie was quite possibly Jafar. The Little Mermaid would require very expensive special effects, and the show probably cannot afford them this season. That is true, the new Oz movie (Oz: The great and powerful) is really good/popular. I highly doubt that disney will allow OUaT to use it. Although I really want the Oz characters in. But i think The Little Mermaid should be okay, except that: where should they flim the little mermaid part. In the sea? It may not fit in that well to the story.

Oz is a great idea if it is allowed by Disney for OUaT to use. We could really use another villian.