Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-24674051-20170113184853/@comment-1916997-20170117013031

Eskaver wrote: (MOD): It's apparent that noone reads the OP or else they'd know that heated arguements about characters you like or dislike, etc are not be discussed. That dicussion ends with this MOD Post. Any further will be deleted.

Nothing is wrong for Lana (who typically has fun, trying to act "in-character") doing any of those things. What the fans do and the toxicity of it hardly relates to her. It's naive to think that she as an actress would not push for storylines for her character. It's simply clear that sarcasm and humor are lost upon most people.

Nevertheless, this thread isn't about defaming real-life people and to push any narrative or speculation unless it's (1) related to the topic and (2) factually based and (3) not defamatory. I agree. The problem is (and I hate to bring it up, but it is such an easy and true example to use) as we saw in the recent US election, a lot of people don't seem to know or care about what is truth and what is fiction. Those "sources" Aime is using are not reliable, and this needs to be addressed. Otherwise, what's the point of any of us trying to discuss anything? If I can write a blog post and then link to it, and be like, look at this proof. We have to establish what is a reliable source VS an unreliable source. And I'm sorry if that is derailing the thread, but just telling everyone they need to shut up, is not helping.