Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-2153169-20140908192157/@comment-24769579-20141018122249

JCAdlawan wrote: WinterWoodsGal wrote:

JCAdlawan wrote:

WinterWoodsGal wrote:

JCAdlawan wrote:

WinterWoodsGal wrote:

Hmcooper4 wrote: I don't see that as a problem. Mainly because I personally know couples that have been in this exact situation. They were told they could not have children, adopted 1 (or more), and then at some point later they get to have a child of their own. It may not be the most common of occurances, but it is definitely not unheard of.

As it stands, though, we don't need to worry about that scenerio. It looks like the canon of Anna and Elsa both being children of the previous King and Queen (I forget their names) is the way that they are going, and they are making "Auntie Vanilla" (Aka The Snow Queen) Elsa's Aunt on her Mom's side. And I have to say I like this twist. The king and queens names, according to Disney Wiki, are Idunn and Adgar. Idunn and AGDAR. :)

It can also be Ithunn and Agthar. :) Typo, and the latter two are unlikely. Well, BECAUSE according to the one who actually translated the runes written on the graves said that it can be Idunn, Agdar or Ithunn Agthar but the TH is pronounced like the way you pronounce it in the words, moTHer and faTHer  I know, but the names with the "th" are not Scandinavian names, so it is unlikely. Well, Okay then. BTW Idun is mostly used than Idunn I used Idunn because it is the traditional spelling.