Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-1916997-20160617033225/@comment-2153169-20160726013204

Killian Jones wrote: Please let's not start with this again. Do you honestly think I don't know the rules? Besides, you put it very well yourself: "We, as fans, can't decide if something is canon or not". You're going against the exact same rule, deciding it is not canon. So please don't pretend your side of the canon-or-not debate is better backed by the rules when it is not. Trying to decide whether it is canon or not is not up to us, so calling it not canon is just as against the rules as calling it canon.

That being said, there is zero evidence whatsoever that this might not be canon. It is an official extra, never-before-seen scene that fits perfectly into the plot without inconsistencies, and is provided to us by the producers through what is likely the most official way there is, the DVD release.

So when I say that we should consider it canon it is not because I lack knowledge about the rules, or because I just pretend to override them, it is because to my understanding, deciding to not consider it canon is more far-fetched from the facts we have so far, than considering it canon altogether.

Not saying it is not canon, just saying as long as we don't know for sure we can't make the assumption it is and so working with it as canon. That's all. Working with it, and considering it as canon would be wrong. That's why we have to get a word.

It is easy, when we don't know something we don't use it. That's all.