Board Thread:Rant and Rave/@comment-25491743-20180209181244/@comment-4975807-20180405175952

Aine1989 wrote: Exactly. Giving into the bullies only showed them that their behaviour wasn't going to be challenged-it would be rewarded, and they wouldn't face any consequences for it. Lana in particular seemed like a people-pleaser who was open to SQ but recently at a con she put her foot down and said "no".

And the worst thing is it ruined it for everyone else. Because I'm pretty sure if you removed the bad apples from the situation, then SQ would be treated a lot more like Captain Charming, although I can't be sure because Josh and Colin seem much closer than Jen and Lana. And I read somewhere that because of that FT3 incident, Jen doesn't want to do events with Lana (like don't quote me on that though, I heard it along the grape-vine, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was true).

For ref: The FT3 incident was when there was  a Colin/Jen photo op scheduled and not a Jen/Lana one, and a small group of SQ BAs lost it and called Jen and Xivents homophobes and it got so bad Jen cancelled her appearance at the whole con. Wow... Those SQers at FT3 behaved like a bunch of idiots. How is not having a scheduled Jen/Lana photo op supposed to imply there is anything homophobic going on? I don't see their logic at all.