Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-33700340-20171119134839/@comment-24264679-20171121184446

CoolDudeAl wrote: KnocknickKnock wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: KnocknickKnock wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Definitly a no. Also, Regina is still infertile, so she couldn't be her daughter, even if the writers wanted to. We already saw a way to undo the infertile spell. The same Spellwas put on Snow and the water from the lake easily cured her. So the writers could 100% do it with ease if they wanted. They could, but they would have to show us that, which they haven't. Did you not say they couldn't give Regina a child even if they wanted to?

Clearly they can with ease as the infertile storyline has been addressed. My point is if the writers wanted to give Regina a child they could easily do it at a drop of a hat. They could easily say sometime in her past she drank from the lake. Not complicated at all. My point is they would have to address the infertility. So yes, they could give Regina some magical cure, and she could have a child, but all that would have to be shown. They wouldn't just mention she cured her infertility in passing. That is too big of a moment for Regina to not show it. They could just mention it no need to show it. We already seen the lake we wouldn't need to see it again. They could easily mention she simply drank from the lake after she took the potion at any given time in her past. If they didn't show how Cora got Maleficent magic book or became Queen of Wonderland then they don't need to show this. They didn't show how Regina was bansihed either.