Board Thread:Show-Related Questions and Answers/@comment-1894786-20151010195524/@comment-1894786-20151013025305

ROSSELLA1 wrote: I still don't think so. No matter where she ran, he always followed her and no one else believed her or would do anything about it. Also, her running would have left everyone in her new life at his mercy. She had to do something. She was also Queen at that point so she was part of the law and, depending on the type of monarchy, above it. Killing him was to defend herself, her loved ones, and executing him for his crimes. You can see it whatever way you want, though. Killing, even if it's for the right reasons such as self-defense or the heat of battle, is still the taking of a life. And that's giving into the darkness, if only slightly.

But you're right, I'll see it differently than you, and that's not a bad thing, it's just fact. :)