Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1916997-20150312220054/@comment-1894786-20150826190950

DigificWriter wrote: Maybe it's the Joss Whedon and JMS fan in me, but I look at what Adam and Eddy and the other writers are doing and have done thus far (both in terms of the things they have said and the things that they have shown us) in a far different light than many others, and just do not see the justification, in many instances, for the criticism and mentality that I see a lot of fans of the series expressing both here and elsewhere, and firmly believe that there is an erroneous perception out there that there are far more issues with the series in terms of its overall continuity and mythology than there actually are.

A good example of this erroneous perception (as I see it, anyway) is the narrative transition between the Cora story arc of Season 2 and the 'endgame' Season 2 arc involving Greg, Tamara, and Peter Pan that led into and dominated the first portion of Season 3.

It seems to have been taken for granted amongst the fandom that Cora was originally supposed to be the "Big Bad" for the entirety of Season 2, but that Adam and Eddy changed their minds 'midstream' when they found out that they had the rights to use characters from Peter Pan, but the truth of the situation (as can be demonstrated by comments that Adam and Eddy themselves made) is that, fan perception to the contrary aside, the Cora arc played itself out exactly as it was intended to, with the Greg/Tamara/Pan arc being introduced exactly as intended and exactly on schedule.

I firmly believe, based on their comments and on the things that we were shown, that Adam and Eddy were intentionally emulating something that Joss Whedon had done years earlier with the fourth season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which is to lead the fandom to believe that their storyline was going in one direction, only to intentionally reveal that it was actually going in an entirely different direction.

It is unfortunate that this intentional emulation of Joss' storytelling technique for the fourth season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (which I believe to be much better than fandom perception says that it is, being the fourth-best season of the series behind Seasons 6, 5, and 3) was received by the fandom in much the same way (with criticism and the erroneous idea that things were changed 'midstream' even though it can be demonstrated that such is not actually the case), because if you actually sit back and analyze what was really happening, the way in which the storylines from both BtVS Season 4 and OUaT S2 play themselves out is actually quite brilliant and inspired. Except no one's ever complained about Cora dying when she did? We all know that was always the plan.

When people bring up the Home Office mess, it's because both Greg and Tamara were such a big part of the second half of season 2, only to both be killed off brutally in the first episode of season 3, and both of them only ever getting one other mention after that.

That was the beginning of the disjointed continuity for most of us.