Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-2153169-20160816033412/@comment-2153169-20160816053400

CoolDudeAl wrote: I'd like to clarify, he is saying that they are not considering any of them canon for simplicity. It doesn't mean we can't personally accept certain things as canon, especially since quite a few of them explain small plot holes. Anyway, this should make our deleted scene page easier to do, since they are all "not canon" now. What we do personally with these scenes is called "headcanon" and is our personnal canon of OUAT. But on the wiki, we have to follow the real canon in which deleted scenes are not canon ^^