Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-79.219.152.95-20130515182349

Hello Dearies,

for some time I'm thinking about the point, that Rumpelstilzkins undoing may isn't Henry. We remember, what the seer said:

'''The seer speaks of how he will reunite with his son under the most unusual of circumstances, and that there is a young boy who will be the key to Rumplestiltskin finding his son again. However, this boy will also be his undoing.'''

The last time I thought about one point... and just think once about it, what if the boy isn't Henry? What if the boy is Pinocchio? And know the reason why I think so. If there weren't August that told Neal about Emma, Neal and Emma would probably come togehter. So the Evil Queen would never had the chance to adopt Henry and if she didn't adopt Henry...why should Emma come to Storybrooke and break the curse? This is the point..she woundn't! Without the curse broken Mr. Gold would never had the chance to find his son again. So August helped Mr. Gold finding his son. The point with the young boy is also true, because August is turned into a child now. Maybe the writers just want us to think it's Henry, but he isn't?

What do you think?? 