Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-11464223-20151109020125/@comment-11464223-20151109022242

CoolDudeAl wrote: Arctucrus wrote: Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote:

But yeah, they need to clarify the timeline since in The Apprentice, it's established both the Aprrentice and Merlin are 1000's of years old. Not even 1,000. 1000's, which implies 2000 or more. I feel like that could be retconned easily as Merlin and the Apprentice having become the stuff of legend so much so that the legends about them have become (can't think of the word...) over-something-or-other. Like over-done but not quite. IDFK. Overexagurated is the word you seek, lol. OVEREXAGGERATED

THAT ONE.

Thank you. :)