Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-34924658-20170919184815/@comment-34924658-20171002191137

CoolDudeAl wrote: Eskaver wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Except Tremaine is the name of the mother, the daughters do not have this name as far as we know. If we keep all the facts, they are just Clorinda and Tisbe, and that's zero related to the Disney film. This. Clorinda and Tisbe aren't labelled with the name Tremaine and we have no idea how the naming convention works.

The fact that we have to stretch for rreferences for the characters says that they can't be based on them and that it's a bit of a stretch to call them allusions. If the writers wanted, they would have been more heavy handed.

If categorized traits:

Appearance: Tremaine is really close, Thomas is pretty close

Name: Tremaine is exactly the same, Thomas' is referred to in passing (by Snow)

Plot: Both are pretty much exactly the same: Tremaine wants royalty, Thomas's father wants grandchildren, Thomas finds Cinderella, etc.

We have to stretch things to count appearance and plot, which is barely an allusion at that point. It is still an allusion. Don't forget, they were even considering naming (probably) Clorinda: Drizella. They aren't strong allusions, but they do fill the same roles as in the Disney movie. This. The rest of you are still not getting my point even though I have explained it about a hundred times lol. You keep arguing saying things like "but that's not their names", etc. I know but it's still their mother's name, which makes them adaptions by default. Loose adaptions but still an adaption. If they wanted to alienate themselves from Disney for this one, they would've changed Tremaine's name as well, and would not have referenced Ana and Drizella visually.