Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4936165-20140827005907/@comment-4196008-20140827190802

Rena Charming wrote: I never finished reading even the first book on Narnia, and saw none of the movies. I don't know much about Narnia and don't care if they do it or don't do it. Mixing it up with the "Frozen" story, I think, could be a stroke of genius, albeit a slightly predictable one. But oh well. We shall see.

If it's done in the right way, yes it might turn out to be a stroke of genius but it's possible that there will be only some mentions to thrill fans and seasons after a take on narnia and its world.

I don't know, I can't refuse Narnia's author said HUGE THINGS in his books at least for his times. But I didn't like the books. I truly didn't. I read 2 of them and I believe they worth its fame only for the things the author said about other lands, magical creatures and mythologies when the most epic storie back then was- like peter pan.

Disney did an amazing job with the first movie (and only with this one), its the only Narnia thing that I like. It generally fits with the show's concept but I won't like it to happen, mainly because Narnia is about 1000 years of magic and war in a magic world, a twist on a certain character and a glimse of events won't do justice to it.

Narnia isn't about a boy, a girl, a villain, a connection betweeen to people etch. like Peter Pan, Alice or the Arthurian fables, Narnia is about Narnia. Its about time passing through a mythical Land.

I won't buy that: The white witch has a connection with the Snow Queen or maybe that a portal will open and will make Hook, Emma, Regina, Snow, Belle, Rumple, Charming and Henry replace  Suzan, Edmount, Peter, Lucy etch. as an adaptachion of The cronicles of Narnia. 'll be fine with a mention or a reference to Narnia and it's events and characters but no more.

Maleficent is what's Once needs next to be good. Its modern due to the new film, its an anchient fable and its a big Disney thing.