Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-34924658-20170919184815/@comment-25926288-20170926123138

CoolDudeAl wrote: Eskaver wrote: I would refrain from bringing up politics, which is very divisive and completely unrelated.

It’s only be a number of hours since the new proposal got 4-2 anyway. There’s no need to rush to get a result that you approve of and prevent discussion and participation from taking place. If the proposal is pretty much favored, a few more days won’t hurt. (Plus, I’d expect activity to vary during the hiatus). While the specifics were unrelated, the point is valid. If people choose not to vote, they can't complain about the results. And if only 6 people wind up voting, and the vote is 4 to 2, 4 is the majority vote. We can wait a bit longer, but I'm not sure we will get any more opinions. If you look at other threads, you can see many users have commented on various things in the past 6 days, yet we have very few here. If we really need more opinions, I suggest we highlight this thread, so more people notice it. This really isn't that big a thing. Unless you can assure that people are choosing not to particpate, the point is moot anyway you twist it. (Plus, that's a strawman: highlighted)

Look at it this way: It stays 4 to 2 for a week or so, then we can decide from there. C & T aren't high-trafficked spots for people to get information. They are minor characters that we are discussing a small matter about.