Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1940463-20130306130752/@comment-3393671-20130307063652

Applegirl wrote: I see a lot of people want to jump the gun, once again, when we have some kind of info out about a character before the episode actually airs, and try to change it to this info on the article page. I am against doing this because it's just too soon when yes, we have the word of Emilie de Ravin herself, and it's not to say what she said is not credible; it's that the episode simly has not aired yet. I feel like we need that onscreen confirmation her name is Lacey, or if we get to see the official ABC press release for "Lacey" and if it lists Emilie de Ravin playing as Belle / Lacey, then yes, the name change could occur. Other than that, right now Belle (Storybrooke) is staying. If we do create the article for Lacey, do you think it would be better to start it from Episode 19 when her cursed persona finally takes over or should we revise everything that involved her in Storybrooke by changing her Enchanted Forest name to her Storybrooke one in the "Belle (Storybrooke)" article? I honestly would prefer the latter, but I don't know if it would work or not since everybody who knows her in Storybrooke refers to her as "Belle" while calling everybody else by their cursed names.