Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-34924658-20170919184815/@comment-25926288-20170926130856

CadoDoan wrote: I definitely agree with CDA here. This is the problem in this wiki. Sometimes, people really just don't care. And if they choose to not give their opinions (because it's also their right), then we cannot wait for them forever. And I believe this has to be changed for all the discussions. But... the thing I disagree is that it's been only 1 week. Maybe a 1 month will do. That's just my opinion. But I strongly believe that the policies HAVE to be changed for that. When dicussing the time frame:

I proposed an option 2 days ago, it is at 4 to 2 currently. I think we should have a timeframe to complete the process. I really don't think waiting at least until the end of the week is that bad.

Maybe elsewhere we can establish a policy of how long until an issue passes with a majority. (3...5...7 days until finalization?) And majority should win in the case of lack of a pratical consensus.

I agree with the issue is waiting "forever" to finalize a discussion, but I don't think we should just rush things as soon as a majority is met. I do agree with CDA at least in response to finalizing the result. If any proposal has a majority, we should not wait around for weeks to see if it changes. If it was really pressing, then the topic could simply be reintroduced.

Currently:

Esk, CDA, OUAT, Tyson (4) with the current resolution. Don't really know where we get 4 to 2 as there were no objections, but hey, it's 4 to 2.

I think if nothing of note changes in a week, the majority decision should be accepted. There's a difference between large scale wiki changes and changing two sentences on two minor characters' pages.