Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-4877635-20130614170253/@comment-5106672-20131022011124

Utter solitude wrote: GothicNarcissus wrote:

The thing is, given that the age group of the Lost Boys was not specified, especially on the lowest edge, the show won't be surely digging deeper into this subject because... well, it would just be a tiny bit gross. How? Just don't mention/show the little ones XD Yep, but we know there is at least a very well known eleven year old in the bunch. XD

I don't know, maybe I've got a dirty mind, maybe I'm just a bit paranoid about people always thinking the worst when it comes to sex, but I really think that dropping the element of sexuality (in general, not homosexuality) in a place like Neverland might be pernicious, storytelling-wise. For one thing, we all know what teenagers are like. For another, yes, we've got a bunch of boys who do not physically age, but you can't really stop somebody's mind from growing up. And we have seen those boys are not exactly civilised and seem to have gotten used to a "want it, go and get it" fame of mind. You see when this might go? It would be messy, there would be a million ways for detractors to misinterpret it. Maybe, let's just leave the thing alone there and focus back on grown-ups. XD