Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-34924658-20171024194401/@comment-34924658-20171102173151

Lady Junky wrote: Tysonjackson wrote:

Lady Junky wrote:

TheRose123 wrote: I originally went with it being an allusion before I had the whole story. But now my vote goes to it being based on the movie because the similarities in plot and in the character’s name are strong. Because if you take away her name, she has nothing from Disney's Ana for herself ^^ Even though literally all of the similarities came from Anastasia from Disney. The name, the pink dress, her loving a man her mother did not approve of and then disobeying her mother to be with him, her redemption arc, her being an actual character instead of just a stepsister, etc. But whatever you say lol

You know. You could be mature for once, and stop mocking our opinion because we disagree. Not the first time in this thread, that you do that. Between fake accusation and that, that's really tiring.

Between the fact that we're "really annoying" or your little repetitive lols. Like really? 1. I'm not being immature or "mocking" your opinion by stating facts. I respect your opinion, but you have no respect for the fact that it might not be the right one.

2. Fake accusation? I'm intrigued to hear this one.

3. I never said once called you "really annoying". I said this was really annoying. Arguing over whether Anastasia is an "allusion" or not, when you're quick to add something unsourced if you believe it's true. But actually I never even said that this was really annoying to Eskaver, just you. He stated his opinion but he isn't continuously trying to prove the rest of us wrong.

4. Last time I checked saying "Lol" (which in that message I only said once btw) was not against the rules of the Once wiki or Wiki as a whole so your point?

I could go on for hours but I am not because I am trying to keep this thread professional and not let petty, personal dislikes between us mess it up. So thanks!