Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-25926288-20151211170125/@comment-25926288-20160122212808

Farerb wrote: Eskaver wrote: Nah, Rumple is lucky because he's Robert Carlyle and handsome (in the eye of the beholder as is everyone else).

Regina and Archie.....please no (Plus, he's technically older than Cora). Anyhow, Regina needed no love interest, but Tom Ellis could have spiced things up a little and even could have made Robin and Sheriff brothers, lol. And better story........of course.

But the main topic, Emma's being with any of those candidates are fine, but the serious things I will pose to anyone that supprt CS or against it:

1. Emma's love for her son and her relationship with her parents should be foremost in her lives. And seen on-screen too!

2. Will Emma and Hook break up?

I asked number 2 because every typical true love have a period of space and misunderstand and/or redemption. but I feel liek CS isn't doing that and that's what is hurting it.

Snow and Charming has a misunderstanding when George forced Snow to say those vile things to David and we saw them struggle in David Nolan's lies and cowardice. Rumple and Belle is explanatory. Then there was Emma and Neal, who didtched her and was almost as bad as his father and was working on a path of redcemption. Then we have August who did the same. We also have Graham, maybe. But then there is Hook who really doesn't habve any real issue he didn't already solve "Be good for Emma", yet there's no baggage or strife. All good couples have a period of separation or something. Even Robin and Regina separated and they get like no good story or dialogue or screentime together. I think 5A was their version of that. No, doesn't count. That's like saying Rumbelle separated in 5a which they didn't, even if she left for literally two seconds.