Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25926288-20180428005811/@comment-33386384-20180428014112

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote:

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote:

Lady Junky wrote: Lady Rapunzel wrote:

Lady Junky wrote: Anonymous 1029384756 wrote: Ok so I saw Gothel’s mother really her mother? And Alice should be labeled as half wood Nymph now right? No and no. Wth? That wasn't her mother? Of course it was. No, we can't be sure. Apparently Flora was calling all Nymphs her daughters... and they were all sisters. But then, one day, Gothel was meant to be the Mother to all?

Sorry but no, it makes no proof at all that she was biologically her mom. Mother seems to be a title that the Nymphs pass down to the next generation. Flora was prolly the Mother Nature before Gothel. Flora was the head nymph though, so she was Gothel's "mother" regardless of if she was biologically her mother. We don't even know how nymphs procreate on Once, they could work like plants for all we know. We should still somehow indicate that Flora and Yarrow are related to Gothel, even if we have to add a note stating what I just did onto the family tree. Which is absolutely no different from Mother Superior and the Sisters of the Convent.

And yet, we don't add them on a family tree. Difference is we know those are not biological family. Since we don't know how the nymphs procreate, shouldn't we make a note of it. Unless we are making a page for the nymphs, then I guess it can be explained there. Better question is how do we handle the dwarfs? They would be the most similar to this. Exactly. We don't know how these species work. So, without a clear source, we don't add it. That's the policies. Well, than why does Flora treats Gothel differently than the other nymphs? Why does Gothel, out of all the Nymphs, takes the title as the next Mother Nature?