Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-91424-20160807191405/@comment-91424-20160807211411

Hmcooper4 wrote: I kinda like the idea of differentiating between Set Dressing and Props. But extreme care needs to be taken on how some things get classified. my (limited) experience in theater would want the "anthropologie" cup listed as a prop, not as set dressing (though I can see Killian's point about why list it at all). Some things, such as picture frames and large pieces of furniture, are easy to classify, but some smaller things, like dinnerware, might require more thought.

Also, even some things that might be considered set dressing can also fall into the Prop category based on their prominence in the story. Something like the Full Length mirror that Regina used to send Cora to Wonderland could very easily be argued to be prop rather than set dressing.

Point being that while some items are easy to determine, some are not.

Some items may be difficult to determine, but that's what discussions are for. As for the mirror, I think it is quite easy to determine. It is most definitely a prop, since the characters interact with it. Big time. Cora is sent through it, tries to hold on to the frame, it doesn't work, she disappears, the portal closes, the glass shatters... And later she comes out again, though the same mirror.