Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-26159109-20160301190120/@comment-1916997-20160416025149

Hmcooper4 wrote: IMDB is not the most reliable source, but it is not as terrible as, say, wikipedia. I think as long as you take things with a grain or 2 of salt, you're probably OK.

I will say that the listings I have seen in the past of credited stunt doubles and extras (such as dancers) has been accurate enough to warrant acknowledgment of the present information. and in this case, Hyde stunt double definitely lends a lot of credibility to our theory of Jeckyl an Hyde.

Of course, the theory won't be confirmed until the finale airs in May. Not only that, but we have a lot of other evidence pointing toward Jekyll and Hyde as well. Besides this listing, the casting calls (taking out the two brothers part) match Jekyll and Hyde, the clothing Hank and Sam are wearing make sense for Jekyll and Hyde, the identical scratch on their faces make it seem likely they are the same character (a la Jekyll and Hyde), and someone claimed Hank was called Jekyll on set. At this point, I will be very surprised if they are anyone but Jekyll and Hyde.