Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4962906-20151023123622/@comment-25926288-20151023165828

Farerb wrote: Gusey1397 wrote: TBH, if they did have a conversation about Arthur using the sands to make people trust him again, thus removing their memories of the sand and treachery, it wouldn't make sense as Arthur will be the only one with this knowledge. So maybe they shouldn't have used the sand in the first place. But the writers can't seemingly do something without magic. I mean it's not like King George was a decent villain, murdering people, creating an angry mob, pull politcal and emotional sway, or normal and tactical means of doing things.

Random magic FTW!