Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1916997-20150926141249/@comment-26159109-20150926202040

Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: Farerb wrote: I'm still on the opinion that it shouldn't have anything since the book is not canon. If people really insist then it should be on the Disney reference page, nothing more. There's no definitive answer on its canonicity or not. Once's official social media sites are promoting it, which hints to it being official as well. But on the other hand, no one from the crew has confirmed it's canon.

Either way, if it's promoted by Once, then it's Once (i.e. Wonderland, which was never confirmed to be canon, but clearly is.) So I say a page for Fox and the Hound. As for the movie or book, it depends... Which does it reference more? Being official and canon are two different things. The book is official tie-in of the series, hence the promoting. Canon means that it belongs to the universe created by A&E, which means they are the only ones that can decide if something that was written by someone else is canon. In this case they haven't.

There is no question about Wonderland being canon - it was created by A&E, thus making it canon.

Anyway, the information provided by the book is not enough to create a page. A note in the Disney references page is more than enough.