Thread:Applegirl/@comment-9549136-20130622183218

I am here to apologize and proppose something. I talked to Utter about adding when something appeared in the book or in a photo or something but Utter removed mentions like Sidney's in ALWM because "mentioned is for when someone talks about". OK then he suggested that about putting bullet points for names and pictures. I started adding ALL of those stuff to show Utter it's very arbitrary to say one case is to be noted in a bullet point if another is not. My suggestion (what I wanted since the beginning) is this:

when the character appears or is mentioned in the episode there is absolutely NO reason to say if he/she/it is in a photo or name or whatever. I think we should only use that when the character/item/location is absent.

The reason for pointing that kind of thing out is to show the character/item/location had some reference in the episode IN SPITE OF being absent of it.

What I suggest is we vote on whether or not agreeing with something like this:

Using bullet points in appearances section


 * In spite of being absent in "Dreamy", Henry appears in a photo.

or


 * Henry is not absolutely absent in "Dreamy". There is a photo of his.

Another example:


 * In spite of being absent in "Selfless, Brave and True", the Enchanted Forest appears in Henry's storybook.

or


 * The Enchanted Forest is not absolutely absent in "Selfless, Brave and True". It appears in Henry's storybook.

In my opinion ANY other cases could be excluded. I mean, it doesn't matter if Ashley is in a photo in "The Price of Gold" because Ashley herself is too. It matters, otherwise, that Emma and Mary Margaret are in a photo in "The Crocodile" because they themselves are not.

What do you think? 