Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-2153169-20160816033412/@comment-1916997-20160816164358

Lady Junky wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: I'd like to clarify, he is saying that they are not considering any of them canon for simplicity. It doesn't mean we can't personally accept certain things as canon, especially since quite a few of them explain small plot holes. Anyway, this should make our deleted scene page easier to do, since they are all "not canon" now. What we do personally with these scenes is called "headcanon" and is our personnal canon of OUAT. But on the wiki, we have to follow the real canon in which deleted scenes are not canon ^^

Right, we can't consider them canon for the wiki. My point is that not only can we consider them headcanon for ourselves, but certain scenes answer questions that otherwise leave plot holes. Like Regina seeing Ingrid for the first time, for example, and questioning her, but then thinking she must have just forgotten about her. That seems to be the canon explaination. I get we can't consider it canon in the wiki anymore, but when discussing things, I still feel the deleted scenes have things that could be canon, if that makes sense.