Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26033121-20160211071708/@comment-25926288-20160216183115

CoolDudeAl wrote: Farerb wrote: 8Rob wrote: I can't agree with the first one

You're comparing season 1 Regina with Regina at the end of season 3

And it wasn't like Emma and Henry were leaving right in that moment anyway And here is the devolution of a character. This is what Regina, the one who cared about Henry most of all, would have done and should have done. This is why there are people who claim that the character devolved, because they no longer act the way they would have when put in certain situations. I agree that she wouldn't have been agressive about it, but she would have done something, and the only reason she didn't was to push CS, nothing else. What are you even talking about? Why would Regina be worried at the end of Season 3 that Emma was going to take Henry away? I'm sure Regina would have said/done something if that was actually going to happen, but by 321/322, both Emma and Henry had their memories restored. Henry wasn't going to leave everyone without a fight. Regina didn't have to do anything. You just want to claim this show is ruining the characters, even when you point makes no sense. Like I'm sorry you wanted Emma and Neal to be a couple, or Emma and Regina to be a couple, or you just wanted Emma and Regina to be single the whole show, but that is not what the creators wanted. Please calm down a bit. It's within bounds of reasons that Regina would protest Emma's choices regardless if Henry would as well. No harm in expecting Regina to be a little hesistant as it is in her character.

Point out the parts in which you disagree. I did, but there's no  need to devolve into shipping drama (which wasn't pointed out in what you quoted).