Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-3010035-20150701044944/@comment-25926288-20150707162451

DarkCruellaTheFirst wrote: Joseph8 wrote:

Rena Charming wrote: Wasn't it just that Rumple needed the tears from someone tempted by darkness but who managed to avoid it? Doesn't necessarily have to be Anna. Could very easily just be Henry, really. He had the chance to alter whatever he wanted with the magical properties of the quill (which could have catastrophic results), but he chose to snap it. Tested, passed. See? That's a long stretch though. :p Rumple wanted to subjugate her permanently because she broke his contract. It is now up to the new Dark One to subjugate her. Why would Emma need to subjutate her because she broke a contract with Rumple? That Emma is now the DO doesn't mean that she wants to avenge previous DO's just for breaking a contract. If you can't tell, he is a Frozen fanatic. Nothing's wrong with being a fanatic, but it'll be hard to reason with.

1) Rumple could have killed Anna if he really actually cared about it. I don't think he cares to get Anna.

2) Rumple's deals are his deals, not explicit to the Dark One. The DO doesn't make deals, Rumple does.

3) Emma has no clue what transpired between them.

4) Emma wouldn't care about something that is not related to her.

5) Frozen is forever over. They are gone and it will not be revisted in more than a casual mention capacity

6) Not everything is about Frozen or any one character that isn't currently recurring or main.