Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1894786-20151107225625/@comment-26159109-20151108192359

Arctucrus wrote: Farerb wrote: Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: CoolDudeAl wrote: Lady Junky wrote: Arctucrus wrote: All the more reason not to force one person's interpretation of what could obviously be several different interpretations on everyone else, and just leave a simple, blanket statement. That's exactly the problem of your statements. If we put what you and CDA suggested, we will say that all elements from Frozen happened, but are changed. Clearly, some events prolly/could not happened. Olaf is not canon in OUAT, and the Duke could definitely not be a part of Elsa's story. By adding your statement, we would say that he is a part of Elsa's story, which is not true. Better to check all mentioned elements. Well, according to Adam and Eddy all the events are same as seen in the movie, so it wouldn't be untrue. What your suggesting will turn into a huge problem, with people arguing over ever little line and what it means. And it would still leave out things that have to had happened, for anything to even make sense. They said Olaf's story wouldn't be a part of the show, but they never said it wasn't part of that universe. My headcanon is that soon after Frozen Fever (A year before 4x01's flashbacks) he went off to see the world. But my headcanon is that he fell into a hot tub and melted. Regardless, Olaf should not be mentioned at all, he is not a part of the show. Again, that's debatable.

He may not be featured in the show, but if the show's universe and canon extends beyond the show, to content where he is featured, then I can't see why some people wouldn't consider him a part of the show's universe, which, in the end, is really what this wiki is about. It's a matter of opinion. That's exactly the point. Articles should not be a matter of opinions, they should be a matter of facts. Olaf is an example of unnecessary arguments I've mentioned before.