Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1916997-20180221223336/@comment-2153169-20180222102946

CoolDudeAl wrote: Well, we should have it one way or the other. Right now (if I'm remembering correctly) we have Phillip's horse and Belle's horse, for example, and if we have those we should have all the horses. Or we just list none of them. It shouldn't be half and half. That's completely different. Phillip's horse and Belle's horse are named characters from the films. So, they're minor characters from the film. They're not just "all animal", they're more than that.