Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-28081000-20180331170703/@comment-28081000-20180514215809

CadoDoan wrote: StargateFanBB wrote: Which makes no sense since both while technically the same person are still two seperate people. WR should still have a seperate Darkness inside him. This thing about Weaver destroying his DO powers will also destroy WR's DO powers is clearly just an excuse by the writers to resolve the Darkness plot thread. They even have Wish Henry being able to use the Author powers even though the Wish Quill never chose Wish Henry to be the Author. There should be a Wish Isaac in the Wish version of the OUAT Book who should still be the Author. It's just an asspull to resolve the plot. A wish cannot create or copy of something strong as the Darkness. If it did, all of the Dark One mytology in 5A would makes no sense. Neither of Rumple's goal to destroy the Darkness.

Wish Henry is not the Author. The pen just can't distinguish who's wish and who's main. Just like the bottle went to both Hooks in "A Pirate's Life". Proof that a wish can't create or make a copy of something as strong as the Darkness please? It could create an entire alternate world complete with all it's poeple and history up to the point EQS wanted it to and it's real. It should have no problem creating a copy of the Darkness.

It's just a cop-out by the writers to resolve the plot.

The Pen should be able to tell who is the Author and who isn't since it never chose Wish Henry and Wish Isaac ahould still be the Wish version of the Author. None of it makes sense. The Wish Realm is real and should not affected by the Real EF. The bottle thing made no sense either. That should have also summoned Wish Realm Regina aswell.

I'll ask the writers about ur Darkness thoery. Maybe get an answer from them.