Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26221372-20150319011048/@comment-4427410-20150819182113

You're justifying Emma's actions, due to the moral compass of her victims? You can't see that Emma could have lured Cruella and Henry away from the cliff's edge before making her attack? You can't see that?

Emma doesn't need to feel sorry for saving an innocent woman from death.

Marian HAD DIED IN THE PAST. Both Hook and Rumplestiltskin had warned her about changing the timeline. She even convinced Rumple to take a memory stripping potion so that he wouldn't be tempted to change the timeline in order to prevent Neal's death. What are you saying? That it was okay for Emma to save Marian, who had died in the past; but it wasn't okay for Rumpelstiltskin to do the same in order to save Neal? At least Rumplestiltskin did the right thing and took that potion to erase his temptation. Apparently, Emma was incapable of resisting that same temptation. It must have taken a great deal of arrogance on her part to believe that she has to save everyone, regardless of the consequences. . . or not realize there are some people you should not try to save.