Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-26837468-20150311103729/@comment-24950802-20150414210040

Lady Junky wrote: Rena Charming wrote: Lady, the world could simply be a 1920s world. It would be ridiculous if they came up with an entirely new dimension called "1920s New Orleans".

But as far as we know, this is a world about "1920s England" not just "1920s". Tiana could easily fit in the EF. And I would be sad if they first introduce a concrete world, and then they change it just for a plot ^^ Wait, so you would be sad if they used this new world again for a different character? I don't relate to that at all, I'll be remiss if they pass up on such an opportunity and use this new world simply to cater to a one-off story. The notion of this new world, which we have yet to see, isn't as "concrete" as you try to make it out to be - your interpretation of it is quite literal, try having an open mind or at least a wait-and-see attitude about it. I don't understand your line of reasoning especially since you seem to nurture such a disliking for episode 1.09 simply because it focuses on two characters - Hansel and Gretel - who never appear again. At least they fit in the Enchanted Forest and are the stars of a huge, huge fairytale. Isn't creating an entirely new dimension that might never be picked up again a worse storytelling choice? I'd rather reserve hope that when and if they do Tiana, they'll at least include her in the same dimension as Cruella. The original princess from "The Princess and the Frog" would fit fine in the Enchanted Forest, Disney's Tiana would not.