Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-27060727-20170803053127/@comment-27060727-20171025023246

Eskaver wrote: If they really are going to age Belle to the max, I wonder what that means for Gideon.

Let's say Belle was around 30 when she had Gideon. If Belle's in her 70s/80s, then Gideon has to be around his 40s at least. Unless Rumple just outlived both of them.... I guess Giles could've gotten aged a little bit too. Or Gideon can be /away/ at the time of her death and they just never show him finding out because they're focusing on Rumple's POV.

What's going to be weird for me is that I'm sure Rumple will retain his immortal state the whole time, and so Belle will end up looking at lot older than Rumple when she dies (presumably) at 75-80. Rumple's like physically in his 50s, right?

I do think we are way more likely to see Gideon again than Belle though. (Not that I'm convinced this is Belle's absolute final episode) I can see him entering the present-day at some point to look for his father or something.