Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-1894786-20141108191934/@comment-15736398-20141118161646

NickM98 wrote: The Frozen storyline, whilst occuring after the film, is not a sequel to the film (that's possibly being made by Disney at a later date). This storyline is merely an adaption of the film that fits in with its timeline. Whilst I love the film, this wiki focuses on the events that occur within the series only. Yes the film can be considered canon, but there are other wikis with that information. You can kiss this Wiki's credibility goodbye, then.

Applegirl wrote: I get that the Frozen movie is a basis of Once Upon a Time's interpretation of the Frozen characters, but what  I have an issue with is OUAT's adaptation is not a sequel to the movie, and it's not advertised as such, but I fear if we add the Frozen events, some will naturally assume that whatever OUAT is doing with the characters is an official sequel to the movie. That's why you make specific note that nothing in OUaT is Canon to Frozen, but everything in Frozen is Canon to OUaT.

PreskaLover773 wrote: Events in Frozen should stay out of the ecuation. We may all know history of Frozen characters, but it shouldnt be added to timeline, because we only write what happens in Once Upon a Time. The events of Frozen DID happen in Once Upon a Time. They were just depicted externally to the show itself.