Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24268382-20151003010001/@comment-26159109-20151003083339

CoyoteDork wrote:

Farerb wrote:

CoyoteDork wrote:

Farerb wrote:

CoyoteDork wrote:

Farerb wrote:

CoyoteDork wrote:

Farerb wrote: This is perfect. I've always thought Rumple's arc should end with him having a son from Belle. I'm sure Baelfire would love being literally replaced So Rumple shouldn't have kids anymore because of Baelfire? That is ridiculus. Out of respect for Baelfire and what he did to him, yes. In my opinion he shouldn't. Besides, he's hundreds of years old. Just like, die already How old are you?

Rumple doing the right thing with his next son will show his character's growth and development since he didn't at first with Baelfire. Doing what he promised to Baelfire with his family will be more respectfull towards Baelfire than not having children at all. It will be a nice closure for his character. Please do not attempt to patronise me by asking my age, I'm entitled to my own opinions. I do not want closure for Rumple and I do not want him to have a son. I'm sorry, It just seemed to me that someone who thinks that a younger son takes the place of an older son in his father's heart might be too young to grasp the concept of family and fatherhood to realize that is not true.

I'm sorry if I've offended you. I don't want him to have a son because I want Belle to die (my reasons I've explained in a previous comment here). Belle will never die. Disney doesn't allow them to kill any of the princesses.