Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-6175354-20140420035659/@comment-5989182-20140424183952

Gusey1397 wrote: Stonicus wrote: Mewiet wrote:

Stonicus wrote: It's been said this new curse is the same curse as before... It's also been said a few times that the curse must be cast by a daughter of Cora... in keeping with the "rescue" theme of the second curse and that our good guys did it, then it *has* to be Regina, unless Cora has yet another unknown daughter. The first curse needed to be cast by Cora's daughter because that's what Rum saw when he got glimpses of the future. He just didn't realize she had two until much later on. But we've been told it's the same curse and it follows the same rules. One of the rules was that it had to be cast by a daughter of Cora... unless, and this is likely, the writers have lied to us yet another time... =P  If it had to be casty by a daughter or Cora, then how did Peter Pan cast the curse in Storybrooke? I don't think it had to be cast be Cora's daughter everytime. Rumple thought the curse had to be cast be Regina because he thought that was what he saw in his vision[s]