Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-5679696-20141126010024/@comment-25602483-20141128205838

NickM98 wrote: TheSamTrickster wrote: And in order to reverse something simply put you have to redo it. If you want to reverse a surgery you redo the same surgery to correct the mistake, and in this case in order to reverse the curse you have to recast it. That is the price of the curse, otherwise if Regina did not have to cast it buy simply reverse it and counteract pan's curse, she shouldn't have said "I have to pay the price of the curse" which is to give up henry and go back to EF. And that dearie is a proper grammar. Yes, but magic does not work like that. Regina did cast a spell that reversed the Dark Curse by using the scroll's magic, but she didn't cast a new one. As I have stated, her spell merely reversed the effects of her curse. I know that the surgery thing makes sense, but magic is not that simple and is not always predictable in the way that it works. Just to point out you can't really reverse a curse that's already been broken. What to reverse if everything was restored after it was broken, the only thing that remained the same is that they are stuck in SB. So if a curse was cast and was broken, are you really reversing it after true love's kiss already negated all the effect. if the effect of the curse was negated then you can' t really reverse the good outcome of a broken curse right? which is why i still think its another curse. This is just how I see it.