Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4050367-20140717023819/@comment-25926288-20150217122842

Edward Zachary Sunrose wrote: Utter solitude wrote: I don't think he ever intended to do anything with Alexandra... I think he knew what would happen and just put himself into place for it. Still, that's the only other known time that he demanded a baby as payment. Even in James and David's case, he only traded the baby/man for something else, the baby/man spent no time with him, both going immediately to King James. Well, as said before, he probably saw what would happen and asked for her baby. He probably hazily saw that her baby would be taken or lost, so he decided to be the one who takes the baby from her. So, instead of the baby being lost, Thomas was lost instead.