Board Thread:Wiki-Related Discussion/@comment-25491743-20170918135316/@comment-25375217-20170918140115

I don't think the badge system is necessary. Most of the edits done on the wiki are just adding information from a recent article or episode. There's no need to be constantly editing; if anything, it would just encourage users to make small, unnecessary edits just to brag that they have a lot of badges.

I don't think the pictures are a good idea, either. While I personally agree with your assessment that it makes the often long paragraphs more engaging, there are a number of issues: Video categories seem like something that we already should have, so I'm not sure why we don't. I don't think a video gallery for pages is necessary, though; most of the videos on this wiki are promos, interviews, or sneak peeks and belong on the respective episode or season page. It would encourage unnecessary uploads, likely including fan-made videos with watermarks or the like, just to fill up Emma's video gallery.
 * 1) Because of our image policies, every image is wider than it is tall. Images like this do not look as good next to walls of text as images that are taller than wide. In order to make them big enough to tell what's going on, it pushes the text too far to the side.
 * 2) It would be hard to define what exactly is too many pictures for a page, creating unnecessary arguments. Some users might think that one or two pictures are fine for any history section while others might want one for every paragraph or every other paragraph. Rules that fix this would be far too specific and opinionated.
 * 3) It's really not significantly necessary. Most users aren't reading the entirety of Emma Swan's history section anyway,  They will be scrolling, looking for one specific event.  They don't need it to look more appealing to the eye as a whole.