Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26159109-20150722160646/@comment-26159109-20171125123626

Anonymius wrote: Farerb wrote: I feel like if the show had ended after 3A, people would have had better opinions about it.

It seemed to me like A&E lost their passion in 3B, that is where all the major inconsistencies started to happen in my opinion. Yeah actually, sometimes I think that the show should have ended after 3A. I mean it did reach a logical conclusion. Everyone went back to the EF, Rumple sacrificed and redeemed himself, Even the flashbacks felt like those that would play at the end of a series. The only change I would have made (aside from hook coming in to warn Emma ) was that Neal wouldn't have needed to go back, as he was not part of the original curse, so he, Henry and Emma could have been a family.

I partially agree. Yeah, it would have been great if the "one year later" had been Emma, Henry and Neal in Tallahasse together and that would have been the end. Alas abc/a&e/the fandom pushed for CS and Neal had to die. However, I sort of liked that it was more focused on Emma and Henry, leaving Storybrooke together just like they arrived together in the pilot. That was more beautiful and satisfying than anything that we got on 622.