Board Thread:Spoilers!/@comment-27060727-20170915041416/@comment-2153169-20171103031218

CoolDudeAl wrote: Just thought of a crazy theory regarding who Nick could be. Here's his description:

"a confident and charismatic slacker-turned-successful-lawyer. He's polished, but not stuffy or smarmy. A natural guy's guy, Nick has an instant likability and always says the right thing"

So he's confident and charismatic with an instant likeability, and he's also a lawyer. Lawyers are often known for being "bloodsucking". Nick's actor was on True Blood and The Originals (The Vampire Diaries spin-off). Vampires are often very charismatic. Nick is a word for a small cut. Could Nick be Dracula?

To me, it is impossible.

Vampires are pretty common creatures in fictional universes. However, since the very beginning, OUAT never mentioned Vampires as existing creatures. Like no one said that there was a vampire in the entire show, same for OUATIW. Henry mentioned Dracula as a wild guess in 602, but that's all. We got Krakens, werewolves, fairies, etc... But vampires? Absolutely nothing. Even Rumple never mentioned one.

In my opinion, if vampires were canon in the OUATverse, we would had something since a moment, because they are so common, so obvious. Like a mention, like something proving 100% that they are canon. I just think there is no real vampire in our canon and mythology.

Of course, it is only my opinion and I might be wrong. But yea, I really think we won't ever a vampire on OUAT; too late.