Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6208134-20130202010219/@comment-5521796-20130214031721

Anubis16 wrote: @Aqua Mare Aurora's mother was never put under the sleeping curse, at least, I'm assuming, she definatley had a history with Maleficent though, but they shouldn't include movie characters, I think they should stick to characters from books, and if Aurora's mother in Sleeping Beauty wouldn't Aurora be a movie character, also, if her mother is Sleeping Beauty and when we see her backstory I think they should put a blonde wig on Sarah and have her play her mother Then why is the mother called Sleeping Beauty? I know I haven't read the story, but that's what doesn't make sense.

And that's just like other people saying, "they should stick to the Disney versions". Again, it's annoying to here people say things like this, OUaT isn't obligated to stick to ANY versions of these fairytales that's what makes the show amazing is they change it up. Even the Disney versions didn't stick to the original fairytales, no one has to when writing them cuz there are no copy writes on most fairytales, that's what makes them fun and imaginative; having an open mind. It's cool that you like that version of Sleeping Beauty, but not everybody is obligated to do that version.

That'd be really wierd to have a wig on her, lol. It should just be played by another actress.